Kim, have you seen this? Michael James Cranston of Seattle Washington is a convicted criminal and is undergoing bankruptcy proceedings right now

[Mike Cranston, undergoing bankruptcy]

Your failure to jettison Steve after his targeting of Enialle's
daughter will forever brand you a despicable skank.

that's about sums it up. Clearly it's more important she attacks you
then admit you're right. That wouldn't do.

Oh now. I'd rather be me and be consistent with who my friends are
rather than switch alliances at which way the wind blows.

Targeting Enialle's daughter does not equal a mere shift of wind
direction.

Just
because someone may do something that I disagree with doesn't mean
that I give them the heave.

For normal people that would depend on what was done.

I'd be a shitty friend, wouldn't I?

That would depend on what was done, wouldn't it?

No.

So if Steve were a child molestor he'd still be your friend.
But since enialle agrees that you are a despicable skank she is no
longer your friend.
That's interesting. Steve could rape a child and still be your friend,
but somebody who calls you a silly name can't be your friend.

I was Enaille's friend when she did rotten things. I was and am
friends with people who have done rotten things to others and were
involved in various forms of bullshit.
I don't use my friendship as a bargaining chip in someone's behavior.
However, it's nice to see that other people use their friendships as
something to work for. "If you do something I don't like or others
don't like I won't be your friend anymore"
How high school. How Mike Cranston.

How many pedophiles do you count as friends?

2:98-cr-00042-JCC USA v. Cranston
Date filed: 01/21/1998
Date terminated: 10/02/1998


Michael J Cranston (1)
Office: Seattle
Filed: 01/21/1998
County: King
Terminated: 10/02/1998
Reopened:
Other Court Case:
None


Count: 1 Citation: 18:113D.P Offense Level: 1
18:113D.P ASSAULT, OTHER
Def Custody Status:
Flag: CLOSED

Defendant: Michael J Cranston represented by xxxxxxxx

Plaintiff: United States of America represented by xxxxxxxxx


U.S. District Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
(Seattle)
CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:98-cr-00042-JCC-1


Case title: USA v. Cranston
Date Filed: 01/21/1998
Date Terminated: 10/02/1998
Assigned to: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Appeals court case number: 98-30301(Cranston)

Defendant
Michael J Cranston (1) represented by xxxxxxxxxxxx
(representing attorney's info deleted)

Pending Counts
Disposition
18:113D.P ASSAULT, OTHER
(1) SENTENCE IMPOSED: PROBATION FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR.

Highest Offense Level (Opening)
Petty Offense

Terminated Counts
Disposition
None

Highest Offense Level (Terminated)
None

Complaints
Disposition
None

Plaintiff
United States of America represented by xxxxxxxxxxxx
(prosecutor's name/information deleted)


Date Filed # Docket Text
01/21/1998 1 MISDEMEANOR INFORMATION by xxxxxxxxxxx. Michael J Cranston (1)
count(s) 1 (JN) (Entered: 01/23/1998)

07/27/1998 11 MINUTESof Trial 1st day re Cranston: JCC, Dep xxxxxxx (lots
of other people's names deleted)

Witneses sworn & examined. Ehibits marked and admitted Courtfinds: Deft is
found guilty. Sentencing is scheduled for 10/2/98 @9:00am. (dktclk)
Modified on 10/05/1998 (Entered: 08/12/1998)
08/04/1998 10 MOTION for clarification of decision by defendant Michael J
Cranston NOTED FOR 8/14/98 (dktclk) (Entered: 08/10/1998)

IMPOSED:PROBATION FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR. Conditions of Probation:
Standardconditions & those set forth in the PSI. Fine in the amount of$250.
Necessary Penalty Assessment for each count must be paid. Thecourt departs
from the guidelines for the following reasons: those setforth in the PSI.

Deft advised of right to appeal. (dktclk) (Entered:10/05/1998)
10/13/1998 17 NOTICEOF APPEAL by defendant Michael J Cranston from Dist.
Court decision[15-1] (cc: CCA, JCC, counsel, CR, USMO, USPO, USAO, USPTS)
(dktclk)(Entered: 10/15/1998)
10/13/1998 APPEALFEE RECEIVED: Appellant Michael J. Cranston paid fee in
amount of $105.00 ( Receipt 253809) (dktclk) (Entered: 10/15/1998)
10/15/1998 18 ORDERFOR TIME SCHEDULE: Transcript desg due 11/5/98;
transcript file date12/7/98; opening brf due 1/15/99; answer brf due
2/16/99; appellant's(optional) reply due 3/1/99. (dktclk) (Entered:
10/15/1998)
10/15/1998 APPEAL NOTIFICATION packet sent to CCA (cc: cnsl) (dktclk)
(Entered: 10/15/1998)
10/15/1998 ENT-Criminal Case Information for Michael J. Cranston
forwarded to 9th CCA. (dktclk) (Entered: 10/15/1998)
11/02/1998 19 TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION and Ordering Form for dates: 7/27/98
and 2/12/98 (taped). (dktclk) (Entered: 11/02/1998)
11/04/1998 PROPOSED Amended Judgment re Michael J. Cranston (dktclk)
(Entered: 11/04/1998)
11/12/1998 20 AMENDEDJUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE by Judge xxxxxx (info
deleted) as to Michael JCranston (cc: counsel, Judge, USMO, USPO, PTS, Jgm.
Bk., Fin'l) Enteredon: 11/12/98 (dktclk) (Entered: 11/12/1998)
11/25/1998 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number
98-30301 (Cranston) (dktclk) (Entered: 11/27/1998)
12/02/1998 21 TRANSCRIPTof proceedings for the following date(s): 7/27/98
(Re: Trial [17-1] )CR initials: xxxxxxxx (info deleted) (Entered:
12/02/1998)
12/04/1998 22 TRANSCRIPTof proceedings for the following date(s): 2/12/98
(Re: VerbatimTranscript of Arraignment [17-1] ) CR initials: xxxx (info
deleted) (Entered: 12/14/1998)
05/06/1999 CERTIFICATE OF RECORD Transmitted to USCA (cc: all counsel)
(dktclk) (Entered: 05/06/1999)


02/04/2000 23 MANDATE(98-30301) from Circuit Court of Appeals DISMISSING
the appeal [17-1].Order attached. (cc: JCC, all counsel) (dktclk) (Entered:
02/07/2000)





And now for Michael J Cranston's BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS.


U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Western District of Washington (Seattle)
Bankruptcy Petition #: 07-12449-KAO


Assigned to: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (other person's information deleted)
Chapter 13
Voluntary
Asset
Date Filed: 05/30/2007


Debtor
Michael J Cranston
2425 33rd Ave W #304
Seattle, WA 98199
SSN: (Mikey Boy, I'm going to be nice to you and NOT post this)

represented by Michael J Cranston
PRO SE




Trustee
(information deleted)


Filing Date # Docket Text
05/30/2007 1 Chapter13 Voluntary Petition . Chapter 13 Plan due
6/14/2007.IncompleteFilings due by 6/14/2007, Government Proof of Claim due
by 11/26/2007.Filed by Michael J Cranston (USBC Staff - (other person's
information deleted)) Additionalattachment(s) added on 5/31/2007 (USBC
Staff - (information deleted)). (Entered:05/30/2007)
05/30/2007 2 FirstMeeting of Creditors & Notice of Appointment of Interim
Trustee (other person's information deleted) with 341(a) meeting to be held
on 07/02/2007 at08:30 AM at One Union Square (Ch 13 341 Meetings).
Confirmation hearingto be held on 08/01/2007 at 09:30 AM at (other person's
information deleted)'s Courtroom,U.S. Courthouse, Room 7206. Proof of Claim
due by 10/01/2007.Objections for Discharge and Reaffirmation Agreements due
by08/31/2007. (USBC Staff - (other person's information deleted)) (Entered:
05/30/2007)
05/30/2007 Receipt of Chapter 13 Filing Fee - $274.00 by CT. Receipt
Number 00136016. (admin) (Entered: 05/30/2007)
05/30/2007 3 Social Security Number(s) of Debtor(s) Submitted. PDF only
viewable bycourt. Filed by Michael J Cranston . (USBC Staff - (other
person's information deleted))(Entered: 05/31/2007)
05/30/2007 4 Certificateof Credit Counseling for Debtor . Filed by Michael
J Cranston . (USBCStaff - (other person's information deleted)) (Entered:
05/31/2007)
05/30/2007 5 Chapter13 Statement of Current Monthly and Disposable Income .
Filed byMichael J Cranston . (USBC Staff - (other person's information
deleted)) (Entered: 05/31/2007)

blah blah blah


07/05/2007 16 Declaration /Proof of Service of Notice & Motion for
Relief, Memorandum, Declaration in Support of Motion (Related
document(s)13Motion for Relief from Stay, )... Filed by (other person's
information deleted) on behalf of (other person's information deleted)
(Entered: 07/05/2007)
07/05/2007 Chapter 13 First Meeting of Creditors Continued .With 341(a)
meeting to be held on 7/9/2007 at 08:30 AM at One UnionSquare (Ch 13 341
Meetings) (Tr Staff - (other person's information deleted))
(Entered:07/05/2007)
07/06/2007 17 ORDER to Provide Financial Information. (USBC Staff -
(other person's information deleted)) (Entered: 07/06/2007)
07/10/2007 18 Objection to Confirmation of Chapter 13 Plan, (Original
Plan), Notice of Hearing and Certificate of Mailing .Filed by (other
person's information deleted) on behalf of (other person's information
deleted). Objection toConfirmation Hearing: 8/1/2007 at 09:30 AM at (other
person's information deleted)'sCourtroom, U.S. Courthouse, (other person's
information deleted). Response due by 7/25/2007.(Attachments: # 1 Proof of
Service of Objection to Confirmation) ((other person's information
deleted)) (Entered: 07/10/2007)
07/11/2007 19 Amended Proof of Service . Filed by (other person's
information deleted). (Related document(s)13 Motion for Relief from Stay,
). ((other person's information deleted)) (Entered: 07/11/2007)





miguel
--
miguel
***@invalid.invalid

"it must shock you that i respect jackie." - John Seiler

"Too late he understood that when you mate with a black
widow spider, you're on the menu tonight."
- Crash Street Kidd, re: Jackie, Message-ID: <***@drn.newsguy.com>

"Your personal information will continue to be propagated
until someone puts an end to your miserable life.
The worst is yet to come. Trust me." - Michael J Cranston,
Message-ID: <***@anonymous.poster>


"Joan, if you give me your address I'll come kick the shit out of you.
Okay?" - Michael James Cranston, Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>


ATTENTION, all people with the last name of Chaney! The man who posted your home
address and phone number online is known as Michael J
Cranston. He has admitted to encouraging people to call
and harass you in this post: <***@4ax.com>

He can be reached at
Mike Cranston
6529 21st Avenue NW
Seattle WA 98117
[phone]

He has a Washington State Bar ID: 16122
You can look him up online at: http://pro.wsba.org/PublicView-Member.asp?Usr_ID=760292

Michael James Cranston is guilty of at least three federal offenses so
far, and should immediately be reported to the FBI for interstate
phone harassment, death threats, and encouraging people to harass
you and/or your family.

Here's how to contact the appropriate law enforcement agencies
to seek justice:
http://www.fbi.gov/contactus.htm
http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/contactus
http://www.sacpd.org/susp_rpt.html

Michael Cranston of Seattle, Washington is also a convicted criminal as of 1998, and as of July 2007 he is going through bankruptcy in court. See <***@enews.newsguy.com> for solid documentation.

[Daedalus]

Your failure to jettison Steve after his targeting of Enialle's
daughter will forever brand you a despicable skank.

that's about sums it up. Clearly it's more important she attacks you
then admit you're right. That wouldn't do.

Oh now. I'd rather be me and be consistent with who my friends are
rather than switch alliances at which way the wind blows.

Targeting Enialle's daughter does not equal a mere shift of wind
direction.

Just
because someone may do something that I disagree with doesn't mean
that I give them the heave.

For normal people that would depend on what was done.

I'd be a shitty friend, wouldn't I?

That would depend on what was done, wouldn't it?

No.

So if Steve were a child molestor he'd still be your friend.
But since enialle agrees that you are a despicable skank she is no
longer your friend.
That's interesting. Steve could rape a child and still be your friend,
but somebody who calls you a silly name can't be your friend.

I was Enaille's friend when she did rotten things. I was and am
friends with people who have done rotten things to others and were
involved in various forms of bullshit.
I don't use my friendship as a bargaining chip in someone's behavior.
However, it's nice to see that other people use their friendships as
something to work for. "If you do something I don't like or others
don't like I won't be your friend anymore"
How high school. How Mike Cranston.

How many pedophiles do you count as friends?

<snip personal info>

Fake Steve Chaney=funny, Fake Miguel=stupid and whiny.

RL stalking tard Chaney loses again.

Jade

[enialle]

Post by Daedalus

Your failure to jettison Steve after his targeting of Enialle's
daughter will forever brand you a despicable skank.

that's about sums it up. Clearly it's more important she attacks you
then admit you're right. That wouldn't do.

Oh now. I'd rather be me and be consistent with who my friends are
rather than switch alliances at which way the wind blows.

Targeting Enialle's daughter does not equal a mere shift of wind
direction.

Just
because someone may do something that I disagree with doesn't mean
that I give them the heave.

For normal people that would depend on what was done.

I'd be a shitty friend, wouldn't I?

That would depend on what was done, wouldn't it?

No.

So if Steve were a child molestor he'd still be your friend.
But since enialle agrees that you are a despicable skank she is no
longer your friend.
That's interesting. Steve could rape a child and still be your friend,
but somebody who calls you a silly name can't be your friend.

I was Enaille's friend when she did rotten things. I was and am
friends with people who have done rotten things to others and were
involved in various forms of bullshit.
I don't use my friendship as a bargaining chip in someone's behavior.
However, it's nice to see that other people use their friendships as
something to work for. "If you do something I don't like or others
don't like I won't be your friend anymore"
How high school. How Mike Cranston.

How many pedophiles do you count as friends?

<snip personal info>
Fake Steve Chaney=funny, Fake Miguel=stupid and whiny.
RL stalking tard Chaney loses again.
Jade

It's Kim approved I'm sure.

Deserving's got nothing to do with it.
- Clint Eastwood in "Unforgiven"

[Mike Cranston, broke as a joke]

Post by Daedalus

Your failure to jettison Steve after his targeting of Enialle's
daughter will forever brand you a despicable skank.

that's about sums it up. Clearly it's more important she attacks you
then admit you're right. That wouldn't do.

Oh now. I'd rather be me and be consistent with who my friends are
rather than switch alliances at which way the wind blows.

Targeting Enialle's daughter does not equal a mere shift of wind
direction.

Just
because someone may do something that I disagree with doesn't mean
that I give them the heave.

For normal people that would depend on what was done.

I'd be a shitty friend, wouldn't I?

That would depend on what was done, wouldn't it?

No.

So if Steve were a child molestor he'd still be your friend.
But since enialle agrees that you are a despicable skank she is no
longer your friend.
That's interesting. Steve could rape a child and still be your friend,
but somebody who calls you a silly name can't be your friend.

I was Enaille's friend when she did rotten things. I was and am
friends with people who have done rotten things to others and were
involved in various forms of bullshit.
I don't use my friendship as a bargaining chip in someone's behavior.
However, it's nice to see that other people use their friendships as
something to work for. "If you do something I don't like or others
don't like I won't be your friend anymore"
How high school. How Mike Cranston.

How many pedophiles do you count as friends?

<snip personal info>
Fake Steve Chaney=funny, Fake Miguel=stupid and whiny.

Courts of law have shown that Chaney wins and Michael James Cranston REALLY
LOSES.

How many people do you think on AUK take your word over that of 2 courts?

Michael James Cranston = bankrupt convicted criminal

Steve Chaney = NOT bankrupt convicted criminal

Steve Chaney WINS

by
court
decision.


miguel
PS: Don't come back here with a "Chaney loses" without court documents to
back it up.

PPS: Here are some court documents to prove "Michael James Cranston =
LOSER"




2:98-cr-00042-JCC USA v. Cranston
Date filed: 01/21/1998
Date terminated: 10/02/1998


Michael J Cranston (1)
Office: Seattle
Filed: 01/21/1998
County: King
Terminated: 10/02/1998
Reopened:
Other Court Case:
None


Count: 1 Citation: 18:113D.P Offense Level: 1
18:113D.P ASSAULT, OTHER
Def Custody Status:
Flag: CLOSED

Defendant: Michael J Cranston represented by xxxxxxxx

Plaintiff: United States of America represented by xxxxxxxxx


U.S. District Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
(Seattle)
CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:98-cr-00042-JCC-1


Case title: USA v. Cranston
Date Filed: 01/21/1998
Date Terminated: 10/02/1998
Assigned to: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Appeals court case number: 98-30301(Cranston)

Defendant
Michael J Cranston (1) represented by xxxxxxxxxxxx
(representing attorney's info deleted)

Pending Counts
Disposition
18:113D.P ASSAULT, OTHER
(1) SENTENCE IMPOSED: PROBATION FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR.

Highest Offense Level (Opening)
Petty Offense

Terminated Counts
Disposition
None

Highest Offense Level (Terminated)
None

Complaints
Disposition
None

Plaintiff
United States of America represented by xxxxxxxxxxxx
(prosecutor's name/information deleted)


Date Filed # Docket Text
01/21/1998 1 MISDEMEANOR INFORMATION by xxxxxxxxxxx. Michael J Cranston (1)
count(s) 1 (JN) (Entered: 01/23/1998)

07/27/1998 11 MINUTESof Trial 1st day re Cranston: JCC, Dep xxxxxxx (lots
of other people's names deleted)

Witneses sworn & examined. Ehibits marked and admitted Courtfinds: Deft is
found guilty. Sentencing is scheduled for 10/2/98 @9:00am. (dktclk)
Modified on 10/05/1998 (Entered: 08/12/1998)
08/04/1998 10 MOTION for clarification of decision by defendant Michael J
Cranston NOTED FOR 8/14/98 (dktclk) (Entered: 08/10/1998)

IMPOSED:PROBATION FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR. Conditions of Probation:
Standardconditions & those set forth in the PSI. Fine in the amount of$250.
Necessary Penalty Assessment for each count must be paid. Thecourt departs
from the guidelines for the following reasons: those setforth in the PSI.

Deft advised of right to appeal. (dktclk) (Entered:10/05/1998)
10/13/1998 17 NOTICEOF APPEAL by defendant Michael J Cranston from Dist.
Court decision[15-1] (cc: CCA, JCC, counsel, CR, USMO, USPO, USAO, USPTS)
(dktclk)(Entered: 10/15/1998)
10/13/1998 APPEALFEE RECEIVED: Appellant Michael J. Cranston paid fee in
amount of $105.00 ( Receipt 253809) (dktclk) (Entered: 10/15/1998)
10/15/1998 18 ORDERFOR TIME SCHEDULE: Transcript desg due 11/5/98;
transcript file date12/7/98; opening brf due 1/15/99; answer brf due
2/16/99; appellant's(optional) reply due 3/1/99. (dktclk) (Entered:
10/15/1998)
10/15/1998 APPEAL NOTIFICATION packet sent to CCA (cc: cnsl) (dktclk)
(Entered: 10/15/1998)
10/15/1998 ENT-Criminal Case Information for Michael J. Cranston
forwarded to 9th CCA. (dktclk) (Entered: 10/15/1998)
11/02/1998 19 TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION and Ordering Form for dates: 7/27/98
and 2/12/98 (taped). (dktclk) (Entered: 11/02/1998)
11/04/1998 PROPOSED Amended Judgment re Michael J. Cranston (dktclk)
(Entered: 11/04/1998)
11/12/1998 20 AMENDEDJUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE by Judge xxxxxx (info
deleted) as to Michael JCranston (cc: counsel, Judge, USMO, USPO, PTS, Jgm.
Bk., Fin'l) Enteredon: 11/12/98 (dktclk) (Entered: 11/12/1998)
11/25/1998 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number
98-30301 (Cranston) (dktclk) (Entered: 11/27/1998)
12/02/1998 21 TRANSCRIPTof proceedings for the following date(s): 7/27/98
(Re: Trial [17-1] )CR initials: xxxxxxxx (info deleted) (Entered:
12/02/1998)
12/04/1998 22 TRANSCRIPTof proceedings for the following date(s): 2/12/98
(Re: VerbatimTranscript of Arraignment [17-1] ) CR initials: xxxx (info
deleted) (Entered: 12/14/1998)
05/06/1999 CERTIFICATE OF RECORD Transmitted to USCA (cc: all counsel)
(dktclk) (Entered: 05/06/1999)


02/04/2000 23 MANDATE(98-30301) from Circuit Court of Appeals DISMISSING
the appeal [17-1].Order attached. (cc: JCC, all counsel) (dktclk) (Entered:
02/07/2000)





And now for Michael J Cranston's BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS.


U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Western District of Washington (Seattle)
Bankruptcy Petition #: 07-12449-KAO


Assigned to: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (other person's information deleted)
Chapter 13
Voluntary
Asset
Date Filed: 05/30/2007


Debtor
Michael J Cranston
2425 33rd Ave W #304
Seattle, WA 98199
SSN: (Mikey Boy, I'm going to be nice to you and NOT post this)

represented by Michael J Cranston
PRO SE




Trustee
(information deleted)


Filing Date # Docket Text
05/30/2007 1 Chapter13 Voluntary Petition . Chapter 13 Plan due
6/14/2007.IncompleteFilings due by 6/14/2007, Government Proof of Claim due
by 11/26/2007.Filed by Michael J Cranston (USBC Staff - (other person's
information deleted)) Additionalattachment(s) added on 5/31/2007 (USBC
Staff - (information deleted)). (Entered:05/30/2007)
05/30/2007 2 FirstMeeting of Creditors & Notice of Appointment of Interim
Trustee (other person's information deleted) with 341(a) meeting to be held
on 07/02/2007 at08:30 AM at One Union Square (Ch 13 341 Meetings).
Confirmation hearingto be held on 08/01/2007 at 09:30 AM at (other person's
information deleted)'s Courtroom,U.S. Courthouse, Room 7206. Proof of Claim
due by 10/01/2007.Objections for Discharge and Reaffirmation Agreements due
by08/31/2007. (USBC Staff - (other person's information deleted)) (Entered:
05/30/2007)
05/30/2007 Receipt of Chapter 13 Filing Fee - $274.00 by CT. Receipt
Number 00136016. (admin) (Entered: 05/30/2007)
05/30/2007 3 Social Security Number(s) of Debtor(s) Submitted. PDF only
viewable bycourt. Filed by Michael J Cranston . (USBC Staff - (other
person's information deleted))(Entered: 05/31/2007)
05/30/2007 4 Certificateof Credit Counseling for Debtor . Filed by Michael
J Cranston . (USBCStaff - (other person's information deleted)) (Entered:
05/31/2007)
05/30/2007 5 Chapter13 Statement of Current Monthly and Disposable Income .
Filed byMichael J Cranston . (USBC Staff - (other person's information
deleted)) (Entered: 05/31/2007)

blah blah blah


07/05/2007 16 Declaration /Proof of Service of Notice & Motion for
Relief, Memorandum, Declaration in Support of Motion (Related
document(s)13Motion for Relief from Stay, )... Filed by (other person's
information deleted) on behalf of (other person's information deleted)
(Entered: 07/05/2007)
07/05/2007 Chapter 13 First Meeting of Creditors Continued .With 341(a)
meeting to be held on 7/9/2007 at 08:30 AM at One UnionSquare (Ch 13 341
Meetings) (Tr Staff - (other person's information deleted))
(Entered:07/05/2007)
07/06/2007 17 ORDER to Provide Financial Information. (USBC Staff -
(other person's information deleted)) (Entered: 07/06/2007)
07/10/2007 18 Objection to Confirmation of Chapter 13 Plan, (Original
Plan), Notice of Hearing and Certificate of Mailing .Filed by (other
person's information deleted) on behalf of (other person's information
deleted). Objection toConfirmation Hearing: 8/1/2007 at 09:30 AM at (other
person's information deleted)'sCourtroom, U.S. Courthouse, (other person's
information deleted). Response due by 7/25/2007.(Attachments: # 1 Proof of
Service of Objection to Confirmation) ((other person's information
deleted)) (Entered: 07/10/2007)
07/11/2007 19 Amended Proof of Service . Filed by (other person's
information deleted). (Related document(s)13 Motion for Relief from Stay,
). ((other person's information deleted)) (Entered: 07/11/2007)

[Daedalus]

Post by Mike Cranston, broke as a joke

Post by Daedalus

Your failure to jettison Steve after his targeting of Enialle's
daughter will forever brand you a despicable skank.

that's about sums it up. Clearly it's more important she attacks you
then admit you're right. That wouldn't do.

Oh now. I'd rather be me and be consistent with who my friends are
rather than switch alliances at which way the wind blows.

Targeting Enialle's daughter does not equal a mere shift of wind
direction.

Just
because someone may do something that I disagree with doesn't mean
that I give them the heave.

For normal people that would depend on what was done.

I'd be a shitty friend, wouldn't I?

That would depend on what was done, wouldn't it?

No.

So if Steve were a child molestor he'd still be your friend.
But since enialle agrees that you are a despicable skank she is no
longer your friend.
That's interesting. Steve could rape a child and still be your friend,
but somebody who calls you a silly name can't be your friend.

I was Enaille's friend when she did rotten things. I was and am
friends with people who have done rotten things to others and were
involved in various forms of bullshit.
I don't use my friendship as a bargaining chip in someone's behavior.
However, it's nice to see that other people use their friendships as
something to work for. "If you do something I don't like or others
don't like I won't be your friend anymore"
How high school. How Mike Cranston.

How many pedophiles do you count as friends?

<snip personal info>
Fake Steve Chaney=funny, Fake Miguel=stupid and whiny.

Courts of law have shown that Chaney wins and Michael James Cranston REALLY
LOSES.
How many people do you think on AUK take your word over that of 2 courts?
Michael James Cranston = bankrupt convicted criminal
Steve Chaney = NOT bankrupt convicted criminal
Steve Chaney WINS
by
court
decision.
miguel
PS: Don't come back here with a "Chaney loses" without court documents to
back it up.

Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and sheer insanity
have made you look stupid. Please tell me how I should get a court of
law to determine which froggery sock is more entertaining...

Steve Chaney is a netk00k that sucks at usenet. Chaney loses...

Post by Mike Cranston, broke as a joke
PPS: Here are some court documents to prove "Michael James Cranston =
LOSER"

<snip info again>

Nice meltdown, Wonderbra. Please keep up the good work.

Jade

[John Griffin]

Post by Daedalus
Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and sheer
insanity have made you look stupid.
[ yap yap yap yap... ]

Beautiful example...Illiterate airheads are always worth a few
chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>


* -------------The alt.fan.oj-simpson FAQ-------------*
*Q1: Did The Real Killer walk away from the carcasses *
* at Bundy with O.J. Simpson's blood dripping from *
* a cut on his left hand? *
* A: Yes. *
*-----------------------------------------------------*

[Daedalus]

Post by John Griffin

Post by Daedalus
Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and sheer
insanity have made you look stupid.
[ yap yap yap yap... ]

Beautiful example...Illiterate airheads are always worth a few
chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>

That's cute. John Griffin tries to be coherent for a moment. I suggest
you and Chaney team up. You'd be unstoppable.

Jade

[John Griffin]

On 14 Sep 2007 20:06:45 GMT, John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

Post by Daedalus
Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and sheer
insanity have made you look stupid.
[ yap yap yap yap... ]

Beautiful example...Illiterate airheads are always worth a few
chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>

That's cute. John Griffin tries to be coherent for a moment. I
suggest you and Chaney team up. You'd be unstoppable.

Uhoh...tantrum. HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!

Bimbo, as usual, you’re (no, not “your,” illiterate featherbrain)
confused. It’s plain to see that your (no, illiterate airhead,
not “you’re”) idea of coherence is something dumbed down to yer
(no, dumb wench, not “you’re”) chasmal level. It’s funny to note
your (no, dimwitted trollop, not “you’re”) confession that you
weren’t able to understand what I said.

Staying awake through all those second and third grade years
probably wouldn’t have helped you. Snapping out of your stupor
and screeching FOAM! at the teachers would have been entertaining
for all the normal kids, but it wouldn’t have done anything for
your learning deficit problem. Still, you might have been able
to acquire the vocabulary expected of a six-year-old.

I want to see another of your (no, abecedarian, not “you’re”)
snively little fits as you lurch through this hoop.

[Daedalus]

Post by John Griffin

On 14 Sep 2007 20:06:45 GMT, John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

Post by Daedalus
Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and sheer
insanity have made you look stupid.
[ yap yap yap yap... ]

Beautiful example...Illiterate airheads are always worth a few
chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>

That's cute. John Griffin tries to be coherent for a moment. I
suggest you and Chaney team up. You'd be unstoppable.

Uhoh...tantrum. HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!

Yes, your tantrums are funny. Let 'er rip, Bloviator!

Post by John Griffin
Bimbo, as usual, you’re (no, not “your,” illiterate featherbrain)
confused. It’s plain to see that your (no, illiterate airhead,
not “you’re”) idea of coherence is something dumbed down to yer
(no, dumb wench, not “you’re”) chasmal level. It’s funny to note
your (no, dimwitted trollop, not “you’re”) confession that you
weren’t able to understand what I said.
Staying awake through all those second and third grade years
probably wouldn’t have helped you. Snapping out of your stupor
and screeching FOAM! at the teachers would have been entertaining
for all the normal kids, but it wouldn’t have done anything for
your learning deficit problem. Still, you might have been able
to acquire the vocabulary expected of a six-year-old.
I want to see another of your (no, abecedarian, not “you’re”)
snively little fits as you lurch through this hoop.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Yes that was an excellent tantrum! It brings back
memories.

Shortly after I arrived on usenet in 2000, I attacked another young
newbie with the 'your/you're' grammar lame. I thought I was being very
clever. It was much to my surprise when older and wiser usenetters
flamed me for being such a trite and pedantic moron as to blurt out
that archaic and rudimentary convention. I've strayed from grammar
lames ever since. creativity is a virtue, after all.

How long have you been on usenet again?

Jade

[John Griffin]

On 18 Sep 2007 21:11:36 GMT, John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

On 14 Sep 2007 20:06:45 GMT, John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

Post by Daedalus
Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and
sheer insanity have made you look stupid.
[ yap yap yap yap... ]

Beautiful example...Illiterate airheads are always worth a
few chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>
<chuckle>

That's cute. John Griffin tries to be coherent for a moment.
I suggest you and Chaney team up. You'd be unstoppable.

Uhoh...tantrum. HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!

Yes, your tantrums are funny. Let 'er rip, Bloviator!

“IKYABWAI” yuk yuk yuk

The snit you gushed below makes this even more hilarious than it
usually is when one of you eternally parvenu lamers herds
yourself into the need to resort to it.

Post by John Griffin
Bimbo, as usual, you’re (no, not “your,” illiterate
featherbrain) confused. It’s plain to see that your (no,
illiterate airhead, not “you’re”) idea of coherence is
something dumbed down to yer (no, dumb wench, not “you’re”)
chasmal level. It’s funny to note your (no, dimwitted
trollop, not “you’re”) confession that you weren’t able to
understand what I said.
Staying awake through all those second and third grade years
probably wouldn’t have helped you. Snapping out of your
stupor and screeching FOAM! at the teachers would have been
entertaining for all the normal kids, but it wouldn’t have
done anything for your learning deficit problem. Still, you
might have been able to acquire the vocabulary expected of a
six-year-old.
I want to see another of your (no, abecedarian, not “you’re”)
snively little fits as you lurch through this hoop.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Yes that was an excellent tantrum!

“IKYABWAI” twice?! HAR DE HAR FUCKING HAR HAR HAR! The first one
made the lame story below extra funny, and the lame story makes
this one extra hilarious.

It brings
back memories.

Memories of “IKYABWAI” seconds earlier? nyuk nyuk nyuk

Shortly after I arrived on usenet in 2000, I attacked another
young newbie with the 'your/you're' grammar lame. I thought I
was being very clever. It was much to my surprise when older
and wiser usenetters flamed me for being such a trite and
pedantic moron as to blurt out that archaic and rudimentary
convention. I've strayed from grammar lames ever since.
creativity is a virtue, after all.

Yeah, right. “Wiser” was superfluous, bovine jade. Those miffed
turkeys in that silly apocryphal story would have been random
appearances, therefore very, very, very goddamned unlikely not to
be wiser.

You still haven’t faced the fact that your (no, bimbo, not
“you’re”) illiteracy is your (<---) primary defining attribute.
The most amusing thing is that you seem to think that such an
impuissant flare-up deflects attention from the fact that you’re
(no, airhead, not “your”) still confused about third grade
grammar. You’ll (not “yule,” airhead) never going to advance to
fourth grade level unless you stop fooling yourself and at least
try to improve.

Anyway, you managed to outdo your previous most hilariously
incongruous remark. Jade/Creativity?! That’s just too fuckin’
hilarious for any words except HA HA HA. Your insipid story
above was as close, i.e., not very, as you’ll ever get to
creativity, accepting the doubtful idea that you didn’t copy it
from one of your fellow lamers.

How long have you been on usenet again?

heh. I’m going to let you try again, since that was so poorly
done. You might want to wait a couple of days or up the Midol
volume. Since I already know what your (no, illiterate wench,
not “you’re”) reflexive response to that will be, spend those
days trying to compose a new one. Seriously, if you manage to do
that for your very first time, you might find it more fun than
your standard parroting. I’d be so happy for you that I’d stop
laughing at the absurd hint that creativity can exist between the
same pair of ears with a sluggish mind like yours.

How long have I been evoking conniptions from you again?

Let’s have another one, illiterate jade, and thank you for
complying with that same order above.

To be consistent, dumbass jade should now shriek “fOaM!” and call
it creativity, but what she really needs to do is learn to
appreciate the sorely needed English lessons we normal people
provide for her.

[Mike Cranston, aliens ate my fucking law license!]

Post by John Griffin

On 14 Sep 2007 20:06:45 GMT, John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

Post by Daedalus
Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and sheer
insanity have made you look stupid.
[ yap yap yap yap... ]

Beautiful example...Illiterate airheads are always worth a few
chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>

That's cute. John Griffin tries to be coherent for a moment. I
suggest you and Chaney team up. You'd be unstoppable.

Uhoh...tantrum. HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!
Bimbo, as usual, you’re (no, not “your,” illiterate featherbrain)
confused. It’s plain to see that your (no, illiterate airhead,
not “you’re”) idea of coherence is something dumbed down to yer
(no, dumb wench, not “you’re”) chasmal level. It’s funny to note
your (no, dimwitted trollop, not “you’re”) confession that you
weren’t able to understand what I said.
Staying awake through all those second and third grade years
probably wouldn’t have helped you. Snapping out of your stupor
and screeching FOAM! at the teachers would have been entertaining
for all the normal kids, but it wouldn’t have done anything for
your learning deficit problem. Still, you might have been able
to acquire the vocabulary expected of a six-year-old.
I want to see another of your (no, abecedarian, not “you’re”)
snively little fits as you lurch through this hoop.

This is an act of defamation. Defamation of Bimbos. And second and third
graders. Not to mention dimwitted trollops, illiterate airheads and dumb
wenches. Likening Daedalus to any of those aforementioned groups is highly
actionable.

You have NO IDEA of the legal hell that you're inviting by continuing this
behavior. NO IDEA AT ALL!!!


miguel

[John Griffin]

Post by Mike Cranston, aliens ate my fucking law license!

Post by John Griffin

On 14 Sep 2007 20:06:45 GMT, John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

Post by Daedalus
Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and
sheer insanity have made you look stupid.
[ yap yap yap yap... ]

Beautiful example...Illiterate airheads are always worth a
few chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>
<chuckle>

That's cute. John Griffin tries to be coherent for a moment.
I suggest you and Chaney team up. You'd be unstoppable.

Uhoh...tantrum. HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!
Bimbo, as usual, you’re (no, not “your,” illiterate
featherbrain) confused. It’s plain to see that your (no,
illiterate airhead, not “you’re”) idea of coherence is
something dumbed down to yer (no, dumb wench, not “you’re”)
chasmal level. It’s funny to note your (no, dimwitted
trollop, not “you’re”) confession that you weren’t able to
understand what I said.
Staying awake through all those second and third grade years
probably wouldn’t have helped you. Snapping out of your
stupor and screeching FOAM! at the teachers would have been
entertaining for all the normal kids, but it wouldn’t have
done anything for your learning deficit problem. Still, you
might have been able to acquire the vocabulary expected of a
six-year-old.
I want to see another of your (no, abecedarian, not “you’re”)
snively little fits as you lurch through this hoop.

This is an act of defamation. Defamation of Bimbos. And second
and third graders. Not to mention dimwitted trollops,
illiterate airheads and dumb wenches. Likening Daedalus to any
of those aforementioned groups is highly actionable.
You have NO IDEA of the legal hell that you're inviting by
continuing this behavior. NO IDEA AT ALL!!!
miguel

Oh yeah? Wait and see. I’m going to hire Raymond Ronald
Karczewski to defend my ass. I can stall this as long as it
takes for him to get out of jail.

[R. Hickey]

(Mike Cranston, aliens ate my fucking law

<who the fuck cares?>



Griffin, here's a totally off-topic post but what's new for this bunch? I
thought you'd appreciate this because you were around for the initial
incident.

The first part of this year (2007) I had all my downstairs windows changed
out. They were old aluminum-frame, rattling, leaky, sliding units. I had
'em replaced with those new double-pane energy efficient vinyl windows
(which kick ass, BTW).

While removing the old windows, the guy asked me what had happened to these
windows? I inquired what he meant.

He said it looked like they had been kicked by a mule or a bull. I was
puzzled, but then I remembered what probably caused the damage.

I told the guy it wasn't a mule or a bull, but actually a large,
prehistoric pig dressed like a cow that had done it in a fit of rage.

He looked at me funny.

I told him it was a long story and he'd never understand. He finished the
job and I am liking my new energy efficient windows (that aren't bent up
from enraged pigs in cow-suits banging on them...).

So how goes it? Any hoop-snake sitings? I guess the volcano didn't get you
since you're still walloping the cretins.

Robert

[John Griffin]

Post by R. Hickey

(Mike Cranston, aliens ate my fucking law

<who the fuck cares?>
Griffin, here's a totally off-topic post but what's new for
this bunch? I thought you'd appreciate this because you were
around for the initial incident.
The first part of this year (2007) I had all my downstairs
windows changed out. They were old aluminum-frame, rattling,
leaky, sliding units. I had 'em replaced with those new
double-pane energy efficient vinyl windows (which kick ass,
BTW).
While removing the old windows, the guy asked me what had
happened to these windows? I inquired what he meant.
He said it looked like they had been kicked by a mule or a
bull. I was puzzled, but then I remembered what probably
caused the damage.
I told the guy it wasn't a mule or a bull, but actually a
large, prehistoric pig dressed like a cow that had done it in
a fit of rage.
He looked at me funny.
I told him it was a long story and he'd never understand. He
finished the job and I am liking my new energy efficient
windows (that aren't bent up from enraged pigs in cow-suits
banging on them...).
So how goes it? Any hoop-snake sitings? I guess the volcano
didn't get you since you're still walloping the cretins.
Robert

Glad to hear you’re still kickin’. Have you tried to scam some
Federal money because of that little storm y’all endured a few
months back? I’ve heard that it’s pretty easy. Just
kidding...it’s too bad you ain’t that kind of a guy, and I’m glad
you’re in the part of town where flooding isn’t allowed.

I can remember your encounter with the thing like it was
yesterday. I hope I remembered to thank you for the warning that
it was heading northwest and expected to impact in Bremerton. You
might be comforted to know that some injuns might have killed it
with their traditional 250-horsepower motorboat and their
traditional .50 caliber rifle a couple of weeks ago. Whatever
they murdered sank to the bottom of the ocean, so there’s no
definitive word on its identity yet, but the size was about
right.

Sadly, the hoop snake whose early life I described around the
time of your encounter with that thing met an untimely end, a
direct result of the thing stalking me. Some time after your
experience with the one-cow herd, the snake moved from Arkansas
to the Seattle area and changed its name from Chester to Ole. It
grew to be the Alpha Hoop Snake in the King County flock, and I
hired it as a sort of guard dog. It brought along a few of its
offspring. You should have seen the little bastards rolling up
and down my driveway. They were showing off, because, as you
know, Ole never learned to roll uphill and he had better sense
than to roll downhill without a safety net after that time he got
stuck oscillating. The one you keep in your back yard is a
slightly different species, with that special adaptation that
allows it to roll over cattle guards and steal pralines from
little kids as it rolls past them a full speed, but Ole and his
kind were almost Cranston-stupid, so most of the little ones were
dead by the time old Ole got his. One of them forgot to unhoop
and rolled all the way down to the road, where it was run over
twice by a green 1951 Studebaker. The next one to go was just
learning to hoop up, and ended up bashing its brains out because
it hooped backward. You probably know that only their chin and
underside is armored and a smart hoop snake will never roll on
its back. A third one rolled into the woods and the chickens ate
it. There was a two-headed one, named Amphis and Baenum for
obvious reasons. It starved to death when it got itself “U”-ed
around a tree and couldn’t agree on which way to go to get to the
baby ducks.

You can probably guess what finally happened to Ole. The monster
found me, after putting 900,000 miles on the old Ford driving
every road between Moses Lake and Bremerton over and over with
some kind of hillbilly detector. She snuck up my driveway while
I was listening with earphones to some Rossini overtures and
humming “Tiny Bubbles.” I felt the house shaking just in time to
unleash old Ole and sic him on her. Too bad...he tried to scare
her away, but you know how that goes. Finally, he gave up and
bit her on the ass while she was trying to climb up a tree to
look in my favorite window. (Picture that! That tree is still
shaking, speaking of which I heard that the reason you had to
replace your windows is that they couldn’t stop rattling, even
all these years after The Thing pressed her snout against them.)

Well, after Ole made the mistake of biting that monstrous butt
out there, the few of his kids who were left tried to save him.
They were too young to know that if you hang a snake upside down
in such circumstances, the toxic waste will drip out, so the
little sonsofbitches put a tourniquet on him. You don’t ever put
a tourniquet on a snake, because it makes them sneeze, and with
their throats constricted, it makes their guts sploot right out
of their asshole. I reckon you knew that, but I wanted to remind
you in case your snake gets trichinosis or something. By the way,
if you don’t have lots of time to deal with that sort of problem
next time The Thing visits you, instead of hanging him upside
down for twelve hours, you can grab his tail and twirl him.
About 15 minutes is usually sufficient.

After killing my snake, the monster finally noticed the sign I
hung on the front door (“Wrong Hillbily. John Griffin does not
live here”), so she wedged herself back into the Ford and headed
for the Bayou, where she’s expected to arrive in September. You
should have seen that Ford, listing about 20 degrees. Oh,
wait...you have. heh heh heh

On the other topic, the volcano pretty much went to sleep for a
few years, but it started rebuilding a couple of years ago.
Here’s a time-lapse view of that process, not a very good one,
but a bit better than nothing.
http://www.kirotv.com/video/9966240/index.html
Anyway, I’m at a safe distance that I don’t dare mention, because
The Thing would wear a circular furrow in the states of
Washington and Oregon and the ocean at that distance looking for
me. I don’t want to lose any more snakes.

I was kidding about one thing. Those snakes aren’t nearly
Cranston-stupid. They’re actually as smart as some fish.

[R. Hickey]

Post by John Griffin
Have you tried to scam some
Federal money because of that little storm y’all endured a few
months back? I’ve heard that it’s pretty easy.

Luckily, I didn't endure any damage. If that fuckin' storm had gone a
little further west, I'd have been sucking ass! FEMA was one of the most
poorly-managed and inefficient organizations around, but they didn't sink
to "cranstupid" levels and so some people have gotten helped.

Post by John Griffin
I can remember your encounter with the thing like it was
yesterday...You might be comforted to know that some injuns might have
killed it with their traditional .50 caliber rifle a couple of weeks
ago. Whatever
they murdered sank to the bottom of the ocean, so there’s no
definitive word on its identity yet, but the size was about
right.

That couldn't have been it. If I remember correctly, my prehistoric cow-
costume-clad pig couldn't swim. Probably was a whale or a submarine the
injuns nailed.

Post by John Griffin
After killing my snake, the monster finally noticed the sign I
hung on the front door (“Wrong Hillbily. John Griffin does not
live here”), so she wedged herself back into the Ford and headed
for the Bayou, where she’s expected to arrive in September. You
should have seen that Ford, listing about 20 degrees. Oh,
wait...you have. heh heh heh

Nope, not gonna happen (again). After my incident, the monster tried
stalking a guy in Florida and he was more pro-active than I was. He
notified the cops and after a little discussion with me, we both got
police involved to prevent future stalking. It can't get within 300 yds
of our houses and I think the entire southern U.S. has been tipped off to
keep it north of here. Like that color-alert system to alert folks of
terrorism. If it gets to Texas there's a red alert posted.

Post by John Griffin
I was kidding about one thing. Those snakes aren’t nearly
Cranston-stupid. They’re actually as smart as some fish.

I don't know about that. I think it's their over-confidence that is their
downfall. My snake got all cocky because it learned to go uphill. Problem
is, there ain't much hilly terrain around here.

Long story short, the "hill" it so proudly climbed turned out to be a
levee and the stupid sumbitch realized, too late, that it couldn't swim.
I've yet to replace it.

Let me know if you get any more knowledge of the monster's migrational
attempts.

Come to think of it, I've not heard anything from Egan for years and
years. I wonder if it migrated towards Chicago and it killed Ron or got
killed, itself. Hmmm...

[spooge]

Post by John Griffin

Post by Mike Cranston, aliens ate my fucking law license!

Post by John Griffin

On 14 Sep 2007 20:06:45 GMT, John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

Post by Daedalus
Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and
sheer insanity have made you look stupid.
[ yap yap yap yap... ]

Beautiful example...Illiterate airheads are always worth a
few chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>
<chuckle>

That's cute. John Griffin tries to be coherent for a moment.
I suggest you and Chaney team up. You'd be unstoppable.

Uhoh...tantrum. HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!
Bimbo, as usual, you’re (no, not “your,” illiterate
featherbrain) confused. It’s plain to see that your (no,
illiterate airhead, not “you’re”) idea of coherence is
something dumbed down to yer (no, dumb wench, not “you’re”)
chasmal level. It’s funny to note your (no, dimwitted
trollop, not “you’re”) confession that you weren’t able to
understand what I said.
Staying awake through all those second and third grade years
probably wouldn’t have helped you. Snapping out of your
stupor and screeching FOAM! at the teachers would have been
entertaining for all the normal kids, but it wouldn’t have
done anything for your learning deficit problem. Still, you
might have been able to acquire the vocabulary expected of a
six-year-old.
I want to see another of your (no, abecedarian, not “you’re”)
snively little fits as you lurch through this hoop.

This is an act of defamation. Defamation of Bimbos. And second
and third graders. Not to mention dimwitted trollops,
illiterate airheads and dumb wenches. Likening Daedalus to any
of those aforementioned groups is highly actionable.
You have NO IDEA of the legal hell that you're inviting by
continuing this behavior. NO IDEA AT ALL!!!
miguel

Oh yeah? Wait and see. I’m going to hire Raymond Ronald
Karczewski to defend my ass. I can stall this as long as it
takes for him to get out of jail.

While you're stalling that matter, how about you determine who wrote the
following sentence?:

"You’ll never going to advance to fourth grade level unless you stop
fooling yourself and at least try to improve."

Whomever it was that wrote that illiterate rubbish should be ashamed of
him/her self. Can't say as I blame the author for trying to distance
themself from it.

[John Griffin]

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin

Post by Mike Cranston, aliens ate my fucking law license!

Post by John Griffin

On 14 Sep 2007 20:06:45 GMT, John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

Post by Daedalus
Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and
sheer insanity have made you look stupid.
[ yap yap yap yap... ]

Beautiful example...Illiterate airheads are always worth a
few chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>
<chuckle>

That's cute. John Griffin tries to be coherent for a
moment. I suggest you and Chaney team up. You'd be
unstoppable.

Uhoh...tantrum. HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!
Bimbo, as usual, you’re (no, not “your,” illiterate
featherbrain) confused. It’s plain to see that your (no,
illiterate airhead, not “you’re”) idea of coherence is
something dumbed down to yer (no, dumb wench, not “you’re”)
chasmal level. It’s funny to note your (no, dimwitted
trollop, not “you’re”) confession that you weren’t able to
understand what I said.
Staying awake through all those second and third grade years
probably wouldn’t have helped you. Snapping out of your
stupor and screeching FOAM! at the teachers would have been
entertaining for all the normal kids, but it wouldn’t have
done anything for your learning deficit problem. Still, you
might have been able to acquire the vocabulary expected of a
six-year-old.
I want to see another of your (no, abecedarian, not
“you’re”) snively little fits as you lurch through this
hoop.

This is an act of defamation. Defamation of Bimbos. And
second and third graders. Not to mention dimwitted trollops,
illiterate airheads and dumb wenches. Likening Daedalus to
any of those aforementioned groups is highly actionable.
You have NO IDEA of the legal hell that you're inviting by
continuing this behavior. NO IDEA AT ALL!!!
miguel

Oh yeah? Wait and see. I’m going to hire Raymond Ronald
Karczewski to defend my ass. I can stall this as long as it
takes for him to get out of jail.

While you're stalling that matter, how about you determine who
"You’ll never going to advance to fourth grade level unless
you stop fooling yourself and at least try to improve."

That was such a good question that I decided to search for that
sentence in google's archives. I tried to find a sentence
beginning with the first three words. No luck...except in your
first post about it <snicker>. You're wondering why I didn't go
on and try for one starting with the first four after that
failed, of course. I had a good reason, but it's considerably
above the limits of your mental range, so just take my word for
it.

Amazingly, after three days of desperate proofreading, you found
one sentence with some extraneous words in it but even with only
that one little treasure to work on, you weren't able to copy it
correctly. Why hasn't your mommy taught you how to copy and
paste? There's a tragically dumb bimbo named jade who's a full
time practitioner of copy-and-paste. Maybe she could help you
learn it. It's too bad you couldn't get it right, given that you
were so excited that you're already up to two articles about it
<snicker> and undoubtedly working on a third. How fuckin' lame
is that?! (Hint: Way.)

Anyway, I'm pretty sure I wrote the actual sentence you tried to
copy, and god damn, do I feel silly about typing a couple of
extraneous words! I had no idea it would slap a cretin into a
posting spaz. I'll have to start proofreading this stuff. I'd
accept your application to be my proofreader, but holy shit,
cretin, it took you three days to find that glaring big fuckin'
deal, and then you fucked it up--twice <snicker>. Sorry, you just
aren't ready for the big time.

Post by spooge
Whomever it was that wrote that illiterate rubbish should be
ashamed of him/her self. Can't say as I blame the author for
trying to distance themself from it.

"Whomever"! R O T MF F S M MF A O! <snicker> <snicker>
<snicker> <snicker><snicker> <snicker><snicker> <snicker>

Too fuckin' hilarious. You'll never attain that third grade
grammar level unless you work at it for maybe 5 years--and that
excellent solecism put the permanent fuckin' kibosh on any hope
you had of landing that proofreading job. Try to notice how it
exemplified the profound inconsequence of whether you can or
can't say <whatever>.

* -------------The alt.fan.oj-simpson FAQ-------------*
*Q1: Did The Real Killer walk away from the carcasses *
* at Bundy with O.J. Simpson's blood dripping from *
* a cut on his left hand? *
* A: Yes. *
*-----------------------------------------------------*

[spooge]

Post by John Griffin

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin

Post by Mike Cranston, aliens ate my fucking law license!

Post by John Griffin

On 14 Sep 2007 20:06:45 GMT, John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

Post by Daedalus
Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and
sheer insanity have made you look stupid.
[ yap yap yap yap... ]

Beautiful example...Illiterate airheads are always worth a
few chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>
<chuckle>

That's cute. John Griffin tries to be coherent for a
moment. I suggest you and Chaney team up. You'd be
unstoppable.

Uhoh...tantrum. HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!
Bimbo, as usual, you’re (no, not “your,” illiterate
featherbrain) confused. It’s plain to see that your (no,
illiterate airhead, not “you’re”) idea of coherence is
something dumbed down to yer (no, dumb wench, not “you’re”)
chasmal level. It’s funny to note your (no, dimwitted
trollop, not “you’re”) confession that you weren’t able to
understand what I said.
Staying awake through all those second and third grade years
probably wouldn’t have helped you. Snapping out of your
stupor and screeching FOAM! at the teachers would have been
entertaining for all the normal kids, but it wouldn’t have
done anything for your learning deficit problem. Still, you
might have been able to acquire the vocabulary expected of a
six-year-old.
I want to see another of your (no, abecedarian, not
“you’re”) snively little fits as you lurch through this
hoop.

This is an act of defamation. Defamation of Bimbos. And
second and third graders. Not to mention dimwitted trollops,
illiterate airheads and dumb wenches. Likening Daedalus to
any of those aforementioned groups is highly actionable.
You have NO IDEA of the legal hell that you're inviting by
continuing this behavior. NO IDEA AT ALL!!!
miguel

Oh yeah? Wait and see. I’m going to hire Raymond Ronald
Karczewski to defend my ass. I can stall this as long as it
takes for him to get out of jail.

While you're stalling that matter, how about you determine who
"You’ll never going to advance to fourth grade level unless
you stop fooling yourself and at least try to improve."

That was such a good question that I decided to search for that
sentence in google's archives. I tried to find a sentence
beginning with the first three words. No luck...except in your
first post about it <snicker>.

My bad, to not recognize that you're incapable of remembering your own
word. Mind you, it is entertaining to watch you distance yourself from
them. The next part, where you split a fine hair and whine that I removed
a bit of text to clarify your mistake, will be even more amusing.

Post by John Griffin
You're wondering why I didn't go
on and try for one starting with the first four after that
failed, of course. I had a good reason, but it's considerably
above the limits of your mental range, so just take my word for
it.

I never take the word of a liar, liar. You wrote that appalling sentence,
and you can dance all day and still not change that fact.

Post by John Griffin
Amazingly, after three days of desperate proofreading,

Assumptions are so silly. I read the post in under a minute, and responded
in even less time. Don't presume that because it takes you days to look up
words to use (or as has been proven, misuse), that others are similarly
addled when it comes to composing a response.

Post by John Griffin
you found
one sentence with some extraneous words in it but even with only
that one little treasure to work on, you weren't able to copy it
correctly.

I eddited it for clarity. That is done all the time, usually when dealing
with a blow-hard such as yourself. If your whole defense is simply that
you've been misquoted (and that is your defense), then here is the unedited
version. after you read it again, explain how the slight editing changed
your text. Aside from amgnifying your mistake, that is:

Unedited version:
"The most amusing thing is that you seem to think that such an
impuissant flare-up deflects attention from the fact that you’re
(no, airhead, not “your”) still confused about third grade
grammar. You’ll (not “yule,” airhead) never going to advance to
fourth grade level unless you stop fooling yourself and at least
try to improve."

You see, I don't mind at all that you've asked that your error is repeated.
Hell, I'll repost that one more time just to be certain you can clearly see
your mistakes:

Written by some illiterate twit in "John Griffin"
<***@130.133.1.4>

The most amusing thing is that you seem to think that such an
impuissant flare-up deflects attention from the fact that you’re
(no, airhead, not “your”) still confused about third grade
grammar. You’ll (not “yule,” airhead) never going to advance to
fourth grade level unless you stop fooling yourself and at least
try to improve.

And speaking of "impuissant flare-up" defelection, rarely is one seen on
par with the one I'm responding to, the one where you claim that you were
unable to find the quote, then statred blubbering about it being edited,
and then followed that up with yet another lame (following below, and
completely expected when my original post was written).

Post by John Griffin
Why hasn't your mommy taught you how to copy and
paste?

Oh my, a "yo mama" lame. You're new here.

Post by John Griffin
There's a tragically dumb bimbo named jade

Actually no, there isn't such a person posting on AUK. That you aren't
sufficiently intelligent to read her posts does't make things as you
incorrectly state.

Post by John Griffin
who's a full
time practitioner of copy-and-paste. Maybe she could help you
learn it. It's too bad you couldn't get it right, given that you
were so excited that you're already up to two articles about it
<snicker> and undoubtedly working on a third. How fuckin' lame
is that?! (Hint: Way.)

Aw, you want me to leave you alone.

Post by John Griffin
Anyway, I'm pretty sure I wrote the actual sentence you tried to
copy, and god damn, do I feel silly about typing a couple of
extraneous words!

Had you had the courage to respond to my initial post wherein I mocked your
illiterate effort, you'd know why you are being mocked. And since you're
making the this claim, your error was not "extraneous words", your error
was in the words you used. What words would you remove to make that
abomination of a sentence correct? Simply removing your mistakes would not
magically change that crap in to a proper sentence.

Post by John Griffin
I had no idea it would slap a cretin into a
posting spaz.

You misspelled 'your superior', and the day that 2 posts becomes a "posting
spaz" is the day that Usenet grinds to a halt. That would be merciful if
it stops your mass-murder of the written language.

Post by John Griffin
I'll have to start proofreading this stuff.

Okay, so aside from being a fake intellectual, illiterate reader and
humorless cunt, you're also incapable of writing a basic sentence and you
need to proofread even the easiest words. I already knew that, but it's
good that you're coming to accept with your limitations.

Post by John Griffin
I'd
accept your application to be my proofreader, but holy shit,
cretin, it took you three days to find that glaring big fuckin'

Assumptions again. Tsk, tsk. Now you're just looking stupid. That's a
degree less intelligent than I was originally giving you credit. And you're
fast approaching imbicile status.

Post by John Griffin
deal, and then you fucked it up--twice <snicker>. Sorry, you just
aren't ready for the big time.

Denial ain't just a river in Africa. Hope you've had all of your shots.

Post by John Griffin

Post by spooge
Whomever it was that wrote that illiterate rubbish should be
ashamed of him/her self. Can't say as I blame the author for
trying to distance themself from it.

"Whomever"! R O T MF F S M MF A O! <snicker> <snicker>
<snicker> <snicker><snicker> <snicker><snicker> <snicker>

Ah, the payoff.

Good show. It's always nice when the bait works first time.

Post by John Griffin
Too fuckin' hilarious. You'll never attain that third grade
grammar level unless you work at it for maybe 5 years--and that
excellent solecism put the permanent fuckin' kibosh on any hope
you had of landing that proofreading job. Try to notice how it
exemplified the profound inconsequence of whether you can or
can't say <whatever>.

"Pay no attention to that man behind the screen!" *CRASH!BANG!BOOM!*

Where do you keep your baloon?

Post by John Griffin
* -------------The alt.fan.oj-simpson FAQ-------------*
*Q1: Did The Real Killer walk away from the carcasses *
* at Bundy with O.J. Simpson's blood dripping from *
* a cut on his left hand? *
* A: Yes. *
*-----------------------------------------------------*

You really should learn how to do a proper usenet .sig

[John Griffin]

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin

Post by Mike Cranston, aliens ate my fucking law license!

Post by John Griffin

On 14 Sep 2007 20:06:45 GMT, John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

Post by Daedalus
Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and
sheer insanity have made you look stupid.
[ yap yap yap yap... ]

Beautiful example...Illiterate airheads are always worth
a few chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>
<chuckle>

That's cute. John Griffin tries to be coherent for a
moment. I suggest you and Chaney team up. You'd be
unstoppable.

Uhoh...tantrum. HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!
Bimbo, as usual, you’re (no, not “your,” illiterate
featherbrain) confused. It’s plain to see that your (no,
illiterate airhead, not “you’re”) idea of coherence is
something dumbed down to yer (no, dumb wench, not
“you’re”) chasmal level. It’s funny to note your (no,
dimwitted trollop, not “you’re”) confession that you
weren’t able to understand what I said.
Staying awake through all those second and third grade
years probably wouldn’t have helped you. Snapping out of
your stupor and screeching FOAM! at the teachers would
have been entertaining for all the normal kids, but it
wouldn’t have done anything for your learning deficit
problem. Still, you might have been able to acquire the
vocabulary expected of a six-year-old.
I want to see another of your (no, abecedarian, not
“you’re”) snively little fits as you lurch through this
hoop.

This is an act of defamation. Defamation of Bimbos. And
second and third graders. Not to mention dimwitted
trollops, illiterate airheads and dumb wenches. Likening
Daedalus to any of those aforementioned groups is highly
actionable.
You have NO IDEA of the legal hell that you're inviting by
continuing this behavior. NO IDEA AT ALL!!!
miguel

Oh yeah? Wait and see. I’m going to hire Raymond Ronald
Karczewski to defend my ass. I can stall this as long as
it takes for him to get out of jail.

While you're stalling that matter, how about you determine
"You’ll never going to advance to fourth grade level unless
you stop fooling yourself and at least try to improve."

That was such a good question that I decided to search for
that sentence in google's archives. I tried to find a
sentence beginning with the first three words. No
luck...except in your first post about it <snicker>.

My bad, to not recognize that you're incapable of remembering
your own word. Mind you, it is entertaining to watch you
distance yourself from them. The next part, where you split a
fine hair and whine that I removed a bit of text to clarify
your mistake, will be even more amusing.

Snickering at your weak attempt to get yourself off on my trivial "error" is
a far cry from "distancing." It's no surprise that you can't see that I
could have done so by ignoring your laughable flouncefest instead of
deciding to slap some more of it out of you. I'm almost sorry you felt
compelled to spend another few days on this sorry attempt to salvage
something from your idiocy, since you outgassed a couple of things below
that are irrefutable proof that you're even dumber than the tragically dumb
bimbo jade and even dumber than I thought after your first spew.
heh Dumbshit really believed my sarcastic lie.

I didn't need to search google, you fuckin' moron. I simply opened the
"offending" article again. Articles persist on this server in the group
where I'm reading this even longer than it takes you to read one and compose
your spastic reply to it. No, I'm not kidding...that long. Imagine that.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
You're wondering why I didn't go
on and try for one starting with the first four after that
failed, of course. I had a good reason, but it's
considerably above the limits of your mental range, so just
take my word for it.

I never take the word of a liar, liar. You wrote that
appalling sentence, and you can dance all day and still not
change that fact.

Hilarious. I'm almost sorry you didn't understand what I said, because you
were pathetic enough without that.

I'm going to try to dumb what I said down to your level, i.e., all the way
down. After all, I only mentioned google so I could tell that big fat fib
about the search string, knowing that it would cause you to emit a hilarious
example of how stupid you are. It sure as hell did.

I said I used the search string "You'll never going" and didn't find it.
(Never mind that I mentioned google when I toyed with you earlier.) Now,
only you, among all the imbeciles I laugh at here, can fail to see that a
search for "You'll never going to" must fail after a search for "You'll
never going" has failed. Try real fuckin' hard to understand this, while I
finish dumbing it down. If "abc..." doesn't exist, you fuckin' moron,
"abcd..." CAN NOT exist. Are you beginning to get a clue here? Hint: No.
That exactly substantiates what I said earlier. I wanted to see you prove
that I was right. Thank you for your complaisance, pussy.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
Amazingly, after three days of desperate proofreading,

Assumptions are so silly. I read the post in under a minute,
and responded in even less time. Don't presume that because
it takes you days to look up words to use (or as has been
proven, misuse), that others are similarly addled when it
comes to composing a response.

No, kid, you spent three days on it, and that after months and months of
desperately looking for that sort of thing in my posts. Your entire schtick
is evidence for that assertion.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
you found
one sentence with some extraneous words in it but even with
only that one little treasure to work on, you weren't able to
copy it correctly.

I eddited it for clarity.

<snicker> <snicker> <snicker> <snicker> <snicker> <snicker>

Only you would need that sort of "editing." The whole thing was crystal
clear to anyone else who noticed the extraneous words. The others said to
themselves, "I'd make some remark about that if it weren't so trivial that
only the lamest of the slower life forms would."

Post by spooge
That is done all the time, usually
when dealing with a blow-hard such as yourself. If your whole
defense is simply that you've been misquoted (and that is your
defense), then here is the unedited version. after you read
it again, explain how the slight editing changed your text.

I'm beginning to wonder why you're so excited about this. You're getting
yourself mighty worked up here.

"Defense"...hilarious. Are you really so mentally deprived that you think
anyone could possibly give a rat's ass about something as trivial (to normal
humans) as what's giving you these mental orgasms?!

Post by spooge
"The most amusing thing is that you seem to think that such an
impuissant flare-up deflects attention from the fact that
you’re (no, airhead, not “your”) still confused about third
grade grammar. You’ll (not “yule,” airhead) never going to
advance to fourth grade level unless you stop fooling yourself
and at least try to improve."
You see, I don't mind at all that you've asked that your error
is repeated. Hell, I'll repost that one more time just to be
Written by some illiterate twit in "John Griffin"
The most amusing thing is that you seem to think that such an
impuissant flare-up deflects attention from the fact that
you’re (no, airhead, not “your”) still confused about third
grade grammar. You’ll (not “yule,” airhead) never going to
advance to fourth grade level unless you stop fooling yourself
and at least try to improve.
And speaking of "impuissant flare-up" defelection, rarely is
one seen on par with the one I'm responding to, the one where
you claim that you were unable to find the quote, then statred
blubbering about it being edited, and then followed that up
with yet another lame (following below, and completely
expected when my original post was written).

I and any other normal human reading that would be astounded to see that you
didn't understand my dismissal of your hysterical squawking about that
triviality, if you hadn't already astounded us by getting so orgasmically
excited about it.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
Why hasn't your mommy taught you how to copy and
paste?

Oh my, a "yo mama" lame. You're new here.

Whoa! It's the "you're new here" halfwitticism...who would have expected
that?! ROTMFFLMMFAO! Right out of the bleating of tragically dumb jade,
into the tragically puerile little halfwit's protomind, and repeated here
for my amusement.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
There's a tragically dumb bimbo named jade

Actually no, there isn't such a person posting on AUK. That
you aren't sufficiently intelligent to read her posts does't
make things as you incorrectly state.

You are in no position to assess the tragically dumb bimbo's intelligence.
She was bright enough to ignore my <whatever you want to call it>. You
weren't. Everyone else was. A few seconds at most of the workings of a
normal human mind will have shown them exactly what caused the extraneous
words to remain in that sentence.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
who's a full
time practitioner of copy-and-paste. Maybe she could help
you learn it. It's too bad you couldn't get it right, given
that you were so excited that you're already up to two
articles about it <snicker> and undoubtedly working on a
third. How fuckin' lame is that?! (Hint: Way.)

Aw, you want me to leave you alone.

If you could get over your masochism problem and do that, I'd be
disappointed. I want to see you wriggle when you try to reply to the proof
of your illiteracy below.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
Anyway, I'm pretty sure I wrote the actual sentence you tried
to copy, and god damn, do I feel silly about typing a couple
of extraneous words!

Had you had the courage to respond to my initial post wherein
I mocked your illiterate effort,

Courage?! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Your other article wasn't in the only one of these groups that I read,
bimbo, and it's dumber than shit, even for your kind, to think I had some
obligation to dismiss each of your flouncefests individually. (I'm going
to just let you get all flustered and flouncy about the fact that I knew it
existed instead of telling you how I heard about it. You're an amusing
little thing when you spaz out like this. Be sure to amuse me with some
comments about that.)

Post by spooge
you'd know why you are being
mocked. And since you're making the this claim, your error was
not "extraneous words", your error was in the words you used.

Being mocked by your kind is almost like being slapped with a feather, but
far less "painful."

Below you will find an attempt to dumb down the obvious and unassailable
fact that it was in fact a couple of extraneous words. Start preparing
yourself now, i.e., let those tears continue to flow, but a bit more
copiously.

Post by spooge
What words would you remove to make that abomination of a
sentence correct? Simply removing your mistakes would not
magically change that crap in to a proper sentence.

Jesus H. Fucking Christ! I've overestimated your intelligence!

"You'll never going to advance to fourth grade level..."
"You'll never advance to fourth grade level..."

Let me repeat that for you, since you're (No, not "your," moron)
stupefyingly slow:

"You'll never going to advance to fourth grade level..."
"You'll never advance to fourth grade level..."

Can you tell that two words were removed? If so, prove it by telling me
which ones.

Amuse me by continuing your amazingly stupid insistence that the second line
there is not a proper sentence.

Better yet, amuse the fucking shit out of me by squawking "bait" and trying
to claim that you knew it all along.

I'm already laughing at your forthcoming attempt to claim that you
understood and that you manipulated me into taking time to draw for you that
picture of the situation that fucked up that shit you using in lieu of a
functional brain. Keep in mind that if you had been able to understand it,
you would have flounced into an amusing attempt to affect a didactic tone
and "explain" it to me, instead of embarrassing yourself as you've done so
exquisitely here.

Anyone above the low end of the cretins' intelligence range can see that
removing the two extraneous words corrects the <snicker> "problem." You
can't. Even now, I reckon, with the picture in front of you. While we're
on the subject, if you were cretin-smart, you could even surmise exactly how
I happened to fuck that up. It's obvious to IQ40 and above.

I would bet that you also won't see another way to correct that abbreviated
sentence until I show you, halfwit. Hint: It's what I originally wrote
before I backed up and inserted another gibe at the tragically stupid and
profoundly unlettered jade unit--serendipity at its finest, as it has turned
out.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
I had no idea it would slap a cretin into a
posting spaz.

You misspelled 'your superior', and the day that 2 posts
becomes a "posting spaz" is the day that Usenet grinds to a
halt. That would be merciful if it stops your mass-murder of
the written language.

...says the guy who said "Whomever it was..." <snicker>

The post I decided to reply to in dismissing your foppish mental shitstorm
was a posting spaz all by itself, spaz. A rare feat, but the other one was,
too. Also, it was in a newsgroup I've subscribed to, a fact which, for
reasons beyond you, made it the more convenient of the two for my reply.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
I'll have to start proofreading this stuff.

Okay, so aside from being a fake intellectual, illiterate
reader and humorless cunt, you're also incapable of writing a
basic sentence

You can't imagine how glad I am to see you say that. Watching you fuck
yourself here has been great fun, and that means more. You'll be pouncing on
at least one example to back up that petulant little snivel every day,
right? Wrong. You won't find one. Your obsessive, frantic 12-hour days
rooting around google will be totally wasted. You'll have to choose--either
do that or eat your words, which I'll feed to you now and then just for
grins, starting right here and now.

Post by spooge
and you need to proofread even the easiest
words. I already knew that, but it's good that you're coming
to accept with your limitations.

heh heh Dumbshit really believes I'm going to proofread usenet articles.
This wanker will believe absolutely anything I say.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
I'd
accept your application to be my proofreader, but holy shit,
cretin, it took you three days to find that glaring big
fuckin'

Assumptions again. Tsk, tsk. Now you're just looking stupid.
That's a degree less intelligent than I was originally giving
you credit. And you're fast approaching imbicile status.

That's some mighty fuckin' weak swish.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
deal, and then you fucked it up--twice <snicker>. Sorry, you
just aren't ready for the big time.

Denial ain't just a river in Africa. Hope you've had all of
your shots.

Good grief. It's the "denial" thing. At this point a lamer would say
"you're new here." Fuck, you aren't even ready for the little time, let
alone the big time.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin

Post by spooge
Whomever it was that wrote that illiterate rubbish should be
ashamed of him/her self. Can't say as I blame the author
for trying to distance themself from it.

"Whomever"! R O T MF F S M MF A O! <snicker> <snicker>
<snicker> <snicker><snicker> <snicker><snicker> <snicker>

Ah, the payoff.
Good show. It's always nice when the bait works first time.

BWAAAA<@#$>AA<choke>AAA<gasp>AAAAAHAHA<cough>HAHA HA HA HA HA!

I can't believe you couldn't come up with a better dissimulation than that!
(I'm lying. It's exactly what I and any other normal human who read your
illiterate sentence knew you'd say.)

If you had said "Oops...I know better than that," you would have been lying,
but it wouldn't have been so utterly fuckin' hilarious.

Mental dwarf, that demonstration of your failure to learn the difference
between subject and object was almost as bad as your amazingly dumb failure
to understand the situation that battered you into your entire posting spaz
here.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
Too fuckin' hilarious. You'll never attain that third grade
grammar level unless you work at it for maybe 5 years--and
that excellent solecism put the permanent fuckin' kibosh on
any hope you had of landing that proofreading job. Try to
notice how it exemplified the profound inconsequence of
whether you can or can't say <whatever>.

"Pay no attention to that man behind the screen!"
*CRASH!BANG!BOOM!*
Where do you keep your baloon?

Post by John Griffin
* -------------The alt.fan.oj-simpson FAQ-------------*
*Q1: Did The Real Killer walk away from the carcasses *
* at Bundy with O.J. Simpson's blood dripping from *
* a cut on his left hand? *
* A: Yes. *
*-----------------------------------------------------*

You really should learn how to do a proper usenet .sig

You really should try to explain (to yourself; I couldn't care less) what
made you think that was supposed to be a "proper usenet .sig," fool. After
you try to excuse that idiotic misapprehension, work on trying to tell me
why I should bother using one.

When I decide to use a .sig, maybe I'll use the factual stuff below.
Let me know how you like it, mental dwarf. I'd tell you to swithch to a
fixed font so you don't have to shit yourself over the formatting, but you'd
just say "a what?!"

***********How dumb is this "spooge" cretin?**********
* I wrote "You'll never going to advance." *
* I meant "You'll never advance." *
* Or maybe I meant "You're never going to advance." *
* *
*Q1: Does imbecile "spooge" understand that removing *
* "going to" from what I wrote makes a correct *
* sentence? *
* *
*A1: No! He actually said it doesn't! nyuk nyuk nyuk *
* *
*Q2: Can this cretin see that changing "'ll" to *
* "'re" makes another correct sentence? *
*A1: Fuck no, but he hasn't said so yet. He will. *
******************************************************

Once again, I'm just toying with that shit you use in lieu of a mind, spaz.
I would never use a .sig file of more than four lines. Incidentally, your
coming freakout over a particular one of those lines is going to be almost
as funny as your attempt to rationalize your idiotic "Whomever did it..."
<snicker> <chuckle><snicker> <chuckle><snicker> <chuckle>

It sure would be fun to see you try to refute something I've said. Your
abject failure here was funny, but you seem to have unlimited potential as a
laughing stock if you'll spend the requisite two or three days studying each
of my articles in another desperate search for something to get you off.

*****NOTE: This is not a sig even though its at the bottom.

[Daedalus]

Post by John Griffin

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin

Post by Mike Cranston, aliens ate my fucking law license!

Post by John Griffin

On 14 Sep 2007 20:06:45 GMT, John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

Post by Daedalus
Wonderbra - As usual you're reading comprehension and
sheer insanity have made you look stupid.
[ yap yap yap yap... ]

Beautiful example...Illiterate airheads are always worth
a few chuckles. <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle> <chuckle>
<chuckle>

That's cute. John Griffin tries to be coherent for a
moment. I suggest you and Chaney team up. You'd be
unstoppable.

Uhoh...tantrum. HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!
Bimbo, as usual, you’re (no, not “your,” illiterate
featherbrain) confused. It’s plain to see that your (no,
illiterate airhead, not “you’re”) idea of coherence is
something dumbed down to yer (no, dumb wench, not
“you’re”) chasmal level. It’s funny to note your (no,
dimwitted trollop, not “you’re”) confession that you
weren’t able to understand what I said.
Staying awake through all those second and third grade
years probably wouldn’t have helped you. Snapping out of
your stupor and screeching FOAM! at the teachers would
have been entertaining for all the normal kids, but it
wouldn’t have done anything for your learning deficit
problem. Still, you might have been able to acquire the
vocabulary expected of a six-year-old.
I want to see another of your (no, abecedarian, not
“you’re”) snively little fits as you lurch through this
hoop.

This is an act of defamation. Defamation of Bimbos. And
second and third graders. Not to mention dimwitted
trollops, illiterate airheads and dumb wenches. Likening
Daedalus to any of those aforementioned groups is highly
actionable.
You have NO IDEA of the legal hell that you're inviting by
continuing this behavior. NO IDEA AT ALL!!!
miguel

Oh yeah? Wait and see. I’m going to hire Raymond Ronald
Karczewski to defend my ass. I can stall this as long as
it takes for him to get out of jail.

While you're stalling that matter, how about you determine
"You’ll never going to advance to fourth grade level unless
you stop fooling yourself and at least try to improve."

That was such a good question that I decided to search for
that sentence in google's archives. I tried to find a
sentence beginning with the first three words. No
luck...except in your first post about it <snicker>.

My bad, to not recognize that you're incapable of remembering
your own word. Mind you, it is entertaining to watch you
distance yourself from them. The next part, where you split a
fine hair and whine that I removed a bit of text to clarify
your mistake, will be even more amusing.

Snickering at your weak attempt to get yourself off on my trivial "error" is
a far cry from "distancing." It's no surprise that you can't see that I
could have done so by ignoring your laughable flouncefest instead of
deciding to slap some more of it out of you. I'm almost sorry you felt
compelled to spend another few days on this sorry attempt to salvage
something from your idiocy, since you outgassed a couple of things below
that are irrefutable proof that you're even dumber than the tragically dumb
bimbo jade and even dumber than I thought after your first spew.
heh Dumbshit really believed my sarcastic lie.
I didn't need to search google, you fuckin' moron. I simply opened the
"offending" article again. Articles persist on this server in the group
where I'm reading this even longer than it takes you to read one and compose
your spastic reply to it. No, I'm not kidding...that long. Imagine that.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
You're wondering why I didn't go
on and try for one starting with the first four after that
failed, of course. I had a good reason, but it's
considerably above the limits of your mental range, so just
take my word for it.

I never take the word of a liar, liar. You wrote that
appalling sentence, and you can dance all day and still not
change that fact.

Hilarious. I'm almost sorry you didn't understand what I said, because you
were pathetic enough without that.
I'm going to try to dumb what I said down to your level, i.e., all the way
down. After all, I only mentioned google so I could tell that big fat fib
about the search string, knowing that it would cause you to emit a hilarious
example of how stupid you are. It sure as hell did.
I said I used the search string "You'll never going" and didn't find it.
(Never mind that I mentioned google when I toyed with you earlier.) Now,
only you, among all the imbeciles I laugh at here, can fail to see that a
search for "You'll never going to" must fail after a search for "You'll
never going" has failed. Try real fuckin' hard to understand this, while I
finish dumbing it down. If "abc..." doesn't exist, you fuckin' moron,
"abcd..." CAN NOT exist. Are you beginning to get a clue here? Hint: No.
That exactly substantiates what I said earlier. I wanted to see you prove
that I was right. Thank you for your complaisance, pussy.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
Amazingly, after three days of desperate proofreading,

Assumptions are so silly. I read the post in under a minute,
and responded in even less time. Don't presume that because
it takes you days to look up words to use (or as has been
proven, misuse), that others are similarly addled when it
comes to composing a response.

No, kid, you spent three days on it, and that after months and months of
desperately looking for that sort of thing in my posts. Your entire schtick
is evidence for that assertion.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
you found
one sentence with some extraneous words in it but even with
only that one little treasure to work on, you weren't able to
copy it correctly.

I eddited it for clarity.

<snicker> <snicker> <snicker> <snicker> <snicker> <snicker>
Only you would need that sort of "editing." The whole thing was crystal
clear to anyone else who noticed the extraneous words. The others said to
themselves, "I'd make some remark about that if it weren't so trivial that
only the lamest of the slower life forms would."

Post by spooge
That is done all the time, usually
when dealing with a blow-hard such as yourself. If your whole
defense is simply that you've been misquoted (and that is your
defense), then here is the unedited version. after you read
it again, explain how the slight editing changed your text.

I'm beginning to wonder why you're so excited about this. You're getting
yourself mighty worked up here.
"Defense"...hilarious. Are you really so mentally deprived that you think
anyone could possibly give a rat's ass about something as trivial (to normal
humans) as what's giving you these mental orgasms?!

Post by spooge
"The most amusing thing is that you seem to think that such an
impuissant flare-up deflects attention from the fact that
you’re (no, airhead, not “your”) still confused about third
grade grammar. You’ll (not “yule,” airhead) never going to
advance to fourth grade level unless you stop fooling yourself
and at least try to improve."
You see, I don't mind at all that you've asked that your error
is repeated. Hell, I'll repost that one more time just to be
Written by some illiterate twit in "John Griffin"
The most amusing thing is that you seem to think that such an
impuissant flare-up deflects attention from the fact that
you’re (no, airhead, not “your”) still confused about third
grade grammar. You’ll (not “yule,” airhead) never going to
advance to fourth grade level unless you stop fooling yourself
and at least try to improve.
And speaking of "impuissant flare-up" defelection, rarely is
one seen on par with the one I'm responding to, the one where
you claim that you were unable to find the quote, then statred
blubbering about it being edited, and then followed that up
with yet another lame (following below, and completely
expected when my original post was written).

I and any other normal human reading that would be astounded to see that you
didn't understand my dismissal of your hysterical squawking about that
triviality, if you hadn't already astounded us by getting so orgasmically
excited about it.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
Why hasn't your mommy taught you how to copy and
paste?

Oh my, a "yo mama" lame. You're new here.

Whoa! It's the "you're new here" halfwitticism...who would have expected
that?! ROTMFFLMMFAO! Right out of the bleating of tragically dumb jade,
into the tragically puerile little halfwit's protomind, and repeated here
for my amusement.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
There's a tragically dumb bimbo named jade

Actually no, there isn't such a person posting on AUK. That
you aren't sufficiently intelligent to read her posts does't
make things as you incorrectly state.

You are in no position to assess the tragically dumb bimbo's intelligence.
She was bright enough to ignore my <whatever you want to call it>. You
weren't. Everyone else was. A few seconds at most of the workings of a
normal human mind will have shown them exactly what caused the extraneous
words to remain in that sentence.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
who's a full
time practitioner of copy-and-paste. Maybe she could help
you learn it. It's too bad you couldn't get it right, given
that you were so excited that you're already up to two
articles about it <snicker> and undoubtedly working on a
third. How fuckin' lame is that?! (Hint: Way.)

Aw, you want me to leave you alone.

If you could get over your masochism problem and do that, I'd be
disappointed. I want to see you wriggle when you try to reply to the proof
of your illiteracy below.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
Anyway, I'm pretty sure I wrote the actual sentence you tried
to copy, and god damn, do I feel silly about typing a couple
of extraneous words!

Had you had the courage to respond to my initial post wherein
I mocked your illiterate effort,

Courage?! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Your other article wasn't in the only one of these groups that I read,
bimbo, and it's dumber than shit, even for your kind, to think I had some
obligation to dismiss each of your flouncefests individually. (I'm going
to just let you get all flustered and flouncy about the fact that I knew it
existed instead of telling you how I heard about it. You're an amusing
little thing when you spaz out like this. Be sure to amuse me with some
comments about that.)

Post by spooge
you'd know why you are being
mocked. And since you're making the this claim, your error was
not "extraneous words", your error was in the words you used.

Being mocked by your kind is almost like being slapped with a feather, but
far less "painful."
Below you will find an attempt to dumb down the obvious and unassailable
fact that it was in fact a couple of extraneous words. Start preparing
yourself now, i.e., let those tears continue to flow, but a bit more
copiously.

Post by spooge
What words would you remove to make that abomination of a
sentence correct? Simply removing your mistakes would not
magically change that crap in to a proper sentence.

Jesus H. Fucking Christ! I've overestimated your intelligence!
"You'll never going to advance to fourth grade level..."
"You'll never advance to fourth grade level..."
Let me repeat that for you, since you're (No, not "your," moron)
"You'll never going to advance to fourth grade level..."
"You'll never advance to fourth grade level..."
Can you tell that two words were removed? If so, prove it by telling me
which ones.
Amuse me by continuing your amazingly stupid insistence that the second line
there is not a proper sentence.
Better yet, amuse the fucking shit out of me by squawking "bait" and trying
to claim that you knew it all along.
I'm already laughing at your forthcoming attempt to claim that you
understood and that you manipulated me into taking time to draw for you that
picture of the situation that fucked up that shit you using in lieu of a
functional brain. Keep in mind that if you had been able to understand it,
you would have flounced into an amusing attempt to affect a didactic tone
and "explain" it to me, instead of embarrassing yourself as you've done so
exquisitely here.
Anyone above the low end of the cretins' intelligence range can see that
removing the two extraneous words corrects the <snicker> "problem." You
can't. Even now, I reckon, with the picture in front of you. While we're
on the subject, if you were cretin-smart, you could even surmise exactly how
I happened to fuck that up. It's obvious to IQ40 and above.
I would bet that you also won't see another way to correct that abbreviated
before I backed up and inserted another gibe at the tragically stupid and
profoundly unlettered jade unit--serendipity at its finest, as it has turned
out.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
I had no idea it would slap a cretin into a
posting spaz.

You misspelled 'your superior', and the day that 2 posts
becomes a "posting spaz" is the day that Usenet grinds to a
halt. That would be merciful if it stops your mass-murder of
the written language.

...says the guy who said "Whomever it was..." <snicker>
The post I decided to reply to in dismissing your foppish mental shitstorm
was a posting spaz all by itself, spaz. A rare feat, but the other one was,
too. Also, it was in a newsgroup I've subscribed to, a fact which, for
reasons beyond you, made it the more convenient of the two for my reply.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
I'll have to start proofreading this stuff.

Okay, so aside from being a fake intellectual, illiterate
reader and humorless cunt, you're also incapable of writing a
basic sentence

You can't imagine how glad I am to see you say that. Watching you fuck
yourself here has been great fun, and that means more. You'll be pouncing on
at least one example to back up that petulant little snivel every day,
right? Wrong. You won't find one. Your obsessive, frantic 12-hour days
rooting around google will be totally wasted. You'll have to choose--either
do that or eat your words, which I'll feed to you now and then just for
grins, starting right here and now.

Post by spooge
and you need to proofread even the easiest
words. I already knew that, but it's good that you're coming
to accept with your limitations.

heh heh Dumbshit really believes I'm going to proofread usenet articles.
This wanker will believe absolutely anything I say.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
I'd
accept your application to be my proofreader, but holy shit,
cretin, it took you three days to find that glaring big
fuckin'

Assumptions again. Tsk, tsk. Now you're just looking stupid.
That's a degree less intelligent than I was originally giving
you credit. And you're fast approaching imbicile status.

That's some mighty fuckin' weak swish.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
deal, and then you fucked it up--twice <snicker>. Sorry, you
just aren't ready for the big time.

Denial ain't just a river in Africa. Hope you've had all of
your shots.

Good grief. It's the "denial" thing. At this point a lamer would say
"you're new here." Fuck, you aren't even ready for the little time, let
alone the big time.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin

Post by spooge
Whomever it was that wrote that illiterate rubbish should be
ashamed of him/her self. Can't say as I blame the author
for trying to distance themself from it.

"Whomever"! R O T MF F S M MF A O! <snicker> <snicker>
<snicker> <snicker><snicker> <snicker><snicker> <snicker>

Ah, the payoff.
Good show. It's always nice when the bait works first time.

I can't believe you couldn't come up with a better dissimulation than that!
(I'm lying. It's exactly what I and any other normal human who read your
illiterate sentence knew you'd say.)
If you had said "Oops...I know better than that," you would have been lying,
but it wouldn't have been so utterly fuckin' hilarious.
Mental dwarf, that demonstration of your failure to learn the difference
between subject and object was almost as bad as your amazingly dumb failure
to understand the situation that battered you into your entire posting spaz
here.

Post by spooge

Post by John Griffin
Too fuckin' hilarious. You'll never attain that third grade
grammar level unless you work at it for maybe 5 years--and
that excellent solecism put the permanent fuckin' kibosh on
any hope you had of landing that proofreading job. Try to
notice how it exemplified the profound inconsequence of
whether you can or can't say <whatever>.

"Pay no attention to that man behind the screen!"
*CRASH!BANG!BOOM!*
Where do you keep your baloon?

Post by John Griffin
* -------------The alt.fan.oj-simpson FAQ-------------*
*Q1: Did The Real Killer walk away from the carcasses *
* at Bundy with O.J. Simpson's blood dripping from *
* a cut on his left hand? *
* A: Yes. *
*-----------------------------------------------------*

You really should learn how to do a proper usenet .sig

You really should try to explain (to yourself; I couldn't care less) what
made you think that was supposed to be a "proper usenet .sig," fool. After
you try to excuse that idiotic misapprehension, work on trying to tell me
why I should bother using one.
When I decide to use a .sig, maybe I'll use the factual stuff below.
Let me know how you like it, mental dwarf. I'd tell you to swithch to a
fixed font so you don't have to shit yourself over the formatting, but you'd
just say "a what?!"
***********How dumb is this "spooge" cretin?**********
* I wrote "You'll never going to advance." *
* I meant "You'll never advance." *
* Or maybe I meant "You're never going to advance." *
* *
*Q1: Does imbecile "spooge" understand that removing *
* "going to" from what I wrote makes a correct *
* sentence? *
* *
*A1: No! He actually said it doesn't! nyuk nyuk nyuk *
* *
*Q2: Can this cretin see that changing "'ll" to *
* "'re" makes another correct sentence? *
*A1: Fuck no, but he hasn't said so yet. He will. *
******************************************************
Once again, I'm just toying with that shit you use in lieu of a mind, spaz.
I would never use a .sig file of more than four lines. Incidentally, your
coming freakout over a particular one of those lines is going to be almost
as funny as your attempt to rationalize your idiotic "Whomever did it..."
<snicker> <chuckle><snicker> <chuckle><snicker> <chuckle>
It sure would be fun to see you try to refute something I've said. Your
abject failure here was funny, but you seem to have unlimited potential as a
laughing stock if you'll spend the requisite two or three days studying each
of my articles in another desperate search for something to get you off.
*****NOTE: This is not a sig even though its at the bottom.

Nice work, Spooge!

Jade

[John Griffin]

Post by Daedalus
Nice work, Spooge!
Jade

Summary:

I posted an article in which the following helpful advice to
illiterate bimbo jade appeared:

"You’ll (not “yule,” airhead) never going to advance
to fourth grade level unless you stop fooling yourself
and at least try to improve."

An idiot freaked out...understatingly speaking. He spent three
full days composing his fulminations, which easily essentialized
to "I'm another illiterate imbecile."

I laughed at the dumb sumbitch for going berserk over a couple of
extraneous words and for doing such a stupefyingly lame job of
it.

After spending two days trying to understand the situation, the
idiot shrieked, squawked and gobbled that there is no way
removing two words from that screwup could make a proper
sentence.

I drew a picture for the idiots. (Yes, idiots--without
illiterate jade's help, the other idiot could have completed his
initial "analysis" in a day and a half, but synergistic stupidity
took over when they put their defective minds together, doubling
the time required.) Along with the picture, I included some extra
shit designed to make sure illiterate jade would expose at least
one of her mental and emotional pathologies in reply, and here it
is, as planned.

Illiterate jade, being thusly manipulated, hastens to reveal the
hilarious fact that she agrees with the other idiot. The picture
was way too complicated for her, for her idiotic little familiar,
and maybe for a small percentage of six-year-olds.

Now for the funniest part. Illiterate jade kicked the shit out
of imbecile "spooge" today. Slapped into an incandescent fury,
she shrieked "You promised me that he couldn't make that a
correct sentence by removing words, you idiotic mental midget!"
After slapping the turd around for a while, she calmed down
enough to say "Furthermore, you promised that he wouldn't predict
in writing that we'd have to lie and claim we were just trolling,
moron!" Stupid illiterate jade was so hoppin' mad that the
infrared radiating from her ass set a street on fire. Damn!
What fun!

Be sure to keep up the "trolling" pretense as you lurch through
this hoop, airhead. You'll also goiingg tto need to vent some
more of your anger and frustration. Get on with it.

[spooge]

John Griffin <***@yahooie.com> wrote in news:***@130.133.1.4:

-snip Griffin's whining-

Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular. I didn't read any of it,
mind you, but I'm confident you did a fine job of proving my point about
your lack of intelligence. You can prove it again by re-posting your
response if you wish. And you know you want to.

Post by John Griffin
*****NOTE: This is not a sig even though its at the bottom.

Its (sic) not a sig because its (sic) not configured properly, dummy.

[Art Deco]

Post by spooge
-snip Griffin's whining-
Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular. I didn't read any of it,
mind you, but I'm confident you did a fine job of proving my point about
your lack of intelligence. You can prove it again by re-posting your
response if you wish. And you know you want to.

Post by John Griffin
*****NOTE: This is not a sig even though its at the bottom.

Its (sic) not a sig because its (sic) not configured properly, dummy.

Hmm, Tholen doesn't understand RFC 3676 either.

[John "C"]

Post by Art Deco

Post by spooge
-snip Griffin's whining-
Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular. I didn't read any of it,
mind you, but I'm confident you did a fine job of proving my point about
your lack of intelligence. You can prove it again by re-posting your
response if you wish. And you know you want to.

Post by John Griffin
*****NOTE: This is not a sig even though its at the bottom.

Its (sic) not a sig because its (sic) not configured properly, dummy.

Hmm, Tholen doesn't understand RFC 3676 either.

That could be "it", Ham-brain!

Number one

[dizzy]

Post by spooge
-snip Griffin's whining-
Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular.

Really. Sheesh. Griffendork is obviously hurting, and desperate to
convince us otherwise.

Post by spooge
I didn't read any of it,

Who would bother?

[John Griffin]

Post by dizzy

Post by spooge
-snip Griffin's whining-
Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular.

Really. Sheesh. Griffendork is obviously hurting, and
desperate to convince us otherwise.

Post by spooge
I didn't read any of it,

Who would bother?

r o t mf f l m mf a o !

Hint: Anyone with an IQ between, say, 50 and 70, who wants to
comment about something should make a futile attempt to read it
first, but of course they would fail. This means you and the
bimbo currently hiding behind the anonym "spooge," punk. Anyone
with an IQ over 70 would read it first and then either try to
address it or let it alone. This does not mean either you or the
other bimbo, obviously.

Amuse me again with "I didn't read that...here's what I think of
it." Ask your mommy to try to explain the irony. Fuckin'
hilarious. Bimbos are fun.

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Post by John Griffin

Post by dizzy

Post by spooge
-snip Griffin's whining-
Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular.

Really. Sheesh. Griffendork is obviously hurting, and
desperate to convince us otherwise.

Post by spooge
I didn't read any of it,

Who would bother?

r o t mf f l m mf a o !
Hint: Anyone with an IQ between, say, 50 and 70, who wants to
comment about something should make a futile attempt to read it
first, but of course they would fail. This means you and the
bimbo currently hiding behind the anonym "spooge," punk. Anyone
with an IQ over 70 would read it first and then either try to
address it or let it alone. This does not mean either you or the
other bimbo, obviously.
Amuse me again with "I didn't read that...here's what I think of
it." Ask your mommy to try to explain the irony. Fuckin'
hilarious. Bimbos are fun.

I read something the other day that reminded me of you, John. :)

http://specgram.com/SoLP/13.bishop.language.html

So? Are you, in fact, a professor of education?

Or are you a heretofore undiscovered cousin of same?

rl

[John Griffin]

Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk

Post by John Griffin

Post by dizzy

Post by spooge
-snip Griffin's whining-
Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular.

Really. Sheesh. Griffendork is obviously hurting, and
desperate to convince us otherwise.

Post by spooge
I didn't read any of it,

Who would bother?

r o t mf f l m mf a o !
Hint: Anyone with an IQ between, say, 50 and 70, who wants
to comment about something should make a futile attempt to
read it first, but of course they would fail. This means you
and the bimbo currently hiding behind the anonym "spooge,"
punk. Anyone with an IQ over 70 would read it first and then
either try to address it or let it alone. This does not mean
either you or the other bimbo, obviously.
Amuse me again with "I didn't read that...here's what I think
of it." Ask your mommy to try to explain the irony. Fuckin'
hilarious. Bimbos are fun.

I read something the other day that reminded me of you, John.
:)

Reminded, my ass! 'Fess up--you were already thinking of me.
Okay, maybe not, but either way is weird.

Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk
http://specgram.com/SoLP/13.bishop.language.html
So? Are you, in fact, a professor of education?

Tell me whether or not you're asking that just because I've
mentioned dozens of times that I'm a normal human.

Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk
Or are you a heretofore undiscovered cousin of same?
rl

I very rarely click web links in newsgroup articles, and today
isn't the day. You'll have to give me some details if there was
something interesting at that site, like copy and paste the whole
thing. I hope you can single-handedly excuse the silly pun,
since I'm pretty sure you're the only one posting in this thread
who will get it. Please explain it to the cretins if you decide
to post a reply to this, so they can pretend to have noticed. "I
knew that" is always worth a couple of chuckles, sometimes three
or four.

[John Griffin]

Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk

Post by John Griffin

Post by dizzy

Post by spooge
-snip Griffin's whining-
Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular.

Really. Sheesh. Griffendork is obviously hurting, and
desperate to convince us otherwise.

Post by spooge
I didn't read any of it,

Who would bother?

r o t mf f l m mf a o !
Hint: Anyone with an IQ between, say, 50 and 70, who wants
to comment about something should make a futile attempt to
read it first, but of course they would fail. This means you
and the bimbo currently hiding behind the anonym "spooge,"
punk. Anyone with an IQ over 70 would read it first and then
either try to address it or let it alone. This does not mean
either you or the other bimbo, obviously.
Amuse me again with "I didn't read that...here's what I think
of it." Ask your mommy to try to explain the irony. Fuckin'
hilarious. Bimbos are fun.

I read something the other day that reminded me of you, John.
:)
http://specgram.com/SoLP/13.bishop.language.html
So? Are you, in fact, a professor of education?

You asked that because I've said that I'm a normal
person...right?

Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk
Or are you a heretofore undiscovered cousin of same?

I've been discovered lots of times.

Now that you're back from your usenet vacation, please explain
the pun. The dumbshits posting in this thread are curious.
They're saying to themselves "I snipped that unread, but I can't
figure out what it means." <snicker> As I said before, I'm
asking because I think you're the only one who is bright enough
to get it. Maybe I overestimated you. Just say so...

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Post by John Griffin
You asked that because I've said that I'm a normal
person...right?

Define "normal."

Post by John Griffin

Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk
Or are you a heretofore undiscovered cousin of same?

I've been discovered lots of times.
Now that you're back from your usenet vacation, please explain
the pun.

I wasn't on vacation--I'm just exasperated by all the crap. Posting (and
reading 99.9% of the posts) just isn't very satisfying, but now and
again--when I need a moment of mindlessness--I look in to see what I'm
not missing.

Post by John Griffin
The dumbshits posting in this thread are curious.
They're saying to themselves "I snipped that unread, but I can't
figure out what it means." <snicker> As I said before, I'm
asking because I think you're the only one who is bright enough
to get it. Maybe I overestimated you. Just say so...

Let them wonder.

The post was not one I should've made, and back when it was still
possible to successfully cancel a post, it's what I would've done. Let
them wonder about that too.

On the other hand, the Lingua Pranca and its offspring are hilariously
funny, so it wasn't a total waste. Here's an article that puts me in
mind of usenet as a whole:

http://specgram.com/LP/36.obler.empty.html

Take care, John. I'm off to be a real life human for the rest of the
day.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

AUK Galactic Killfile, 15 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/23766545e259d53c
Winner, Golden Killfile, April 2007
Co-Office Holder, Ministry of Circle Jerks, April and May 2007
Member, Human O-Ring Society, March 2003
NCB#16 BJDS#2 INAC#77 PSLCK#1 SBG#1 A-29204

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle

[John Griffin]

Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk

Post by John Griffin
You asked that because I've said that I'm a normal
person...right?

Define "normal."

If I do that, the cretins (except for airhead jade and her toothless
sycophants) will have a chance to understand the pun.

Okay...what the hell. You asked me if I'm a professor of education. No.
I'm not a teacher at a normal school.

Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk

Post by John Griffin

Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk
Or are you a heretofore undiscovered cousin of same?

I've been discovered lots of times.
Now that you're back from your usenet vacation, please
explain the pun.

I wasn't on vacation--I'm just exasperated by all the crap.
Posting (and reading 99.9% of the posts) just isn't very
satisfying, but now and again--when I need a moment of
mindlessness--I look in to see what I'm not missing.

That works for most of us normal people. There's lots of inadvertent
humor in these groups, and mindlessness is a synonym for the contingent
from alt.usenet.kooks regularly and frantically posting in this thread.

Post by Rhonda Lea Kirk

Post by John Griffin
The dumbshits posting in this thread are curious.
They're saying to themselves "I snipped that unread, but I
can't figure out what it means." <snicker> As I said
before, I'm asking because I think you're the only one who is
bright enough to get it. Maybe I overestimated you. Just say
so...

Let them wonder.
The post was not one I should've made, and back when it was
still possible to successfully cancel a post, it's what I
would've done. Let them wonder about that too.
On the other hand, the Lingua Pranca and its offspring are
hilariously funny, so it wasn't a total waste. Here's an
http://specgram.com/LP/36.obler.empty.html
Take care, John. I'm off to be a real life human for the rest
of the day.

Aha...a normal person.

The stuff at that link was sure as hell worth a mouse click. Brings a
whole new meaning to the word "emptiloquence," even if there was no old
meaning. A purposefully emptiloquent lecture on emptiloquence. Cool!

[B***@hotmail.com]

Post by John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

Post by dizzy

-snipGriffin'swhining-
Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular.

Really. Sheesh. Griffendork is obviously hurting, and
desperate to convince us otherwise.

I didn't read any of it,

Who would bother?

r o t mf f l m mf a o !
Hint: Anyone with an IQ between, say, 50 and 70, who wants
to comment about something should make a futile attempt to
read it first, but of course they would fail. This means you
and the bimbo currently hiding behind the anonym "spooge,"
punk. Anyone with an IQ over 70 would read it first and then
either try to address it or let it alone. This does not mean
either you or the other bimbo, obviously.
Amuse me again with "I didn't read that...here's what I think
of it." Ask your mommy to try to explain the irony. Fuckin'
hilarious. Bimbos are fun.

I read something the other day that reminded me of you,John.
:)
http://specgram.com/SoLP/13.bishop.language.html
So? Are you, in fact, a professor of education?

You asked that because I've said that I'm a normal
person...right?

Or are you a heretofore undiscovered cousin of same?

I've been discovered lots of times.
Now that you're back from your usenet vacation, please explain
the pun. The dumbshits posting in this thread are curious.
They're saying to themselves "I snipped that unread, but I can't
figure out what it means." <snicker> As I said before, I'm
asking because I think you're the only one who is bright enough
to get it. Maybe I overestimated you. Just say so...- Hide quoted text -

BTR 1701, you should read the following:

Steve Chaney is obese.

Joan girrifnTHAL, you're stupid.




It's now time for Joan GriffinTHAL to REmove Her Stupid Self FRom
Usenet Altogether.

Post by John Griffin
- Show quoted text -

[r***@beer.com]

Post by John Griffin

Post by John Griffin

Post by dizzy

-snipGriffin'swhining-
Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular.

Really. Sheesh. Griffendork is obviously hurting, and
desperate to convince us otherwise.

I didn't read any of it,

Who would bother?

r o t mf f l m mf a o !
Hint: Anyone with an IQ between, say, 50 and 70, who wants
to comment about something should make a futile attempt to
read it first, but of course they would fail. This means you
and the bimbo currently hiding behind the anonym "spooge,"
punk. Anyone with an IQ over 70 would read it first and then
either try to address it or let it alone. This does not mean
either you or the other bimbo, obviously.
Amuse me again with "I didn't read that...here's what I think
of it." Ask your mommy to try to explain the irony. Fuckin'
hilarious. Bimbos are fun.

I read something the other day that reminded me of you,John.
:)
http://specgram.com/SoLP/13.bishop.language.html
So? Are you, in fact, a professor of education?

You asked that because I've said that I'm a normal
person...right?

Or are you a heretofore undiscovered cousin of same?

I've been discovered lots of times.
Now that you're back from your usenet vacation, please explain
the pun. The dumbshits posting in this thread are curious.
They're saying to themselves "I snipped that unread, but I can't
figure out what it means." <snicker> As I said before, I'm
asking because I think you're the only one who is bright enough
to get it. Maybe I overestimated you. Just say so...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

joan griffin, you are stupid.

[spooge]

Post by John Griffin

Post by dizzy

Post by spooge
-snip Griffin's whining-
Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular.

Really. Sheesh. Griffendork is obviously hurting, and
desperate to convince us otherwise.

Post by spooge
I didn't read any of it,

Who would bother?

r o t mf f l m mf a o !
Hint: Anyone with an IQ between, say, 50 and 70, who wants to
comment about something should make a futile attempt to read it
first, but of course they would fail. This means you and the
bimbo currently hiding behind the anonym "spooge," punk. Anyone
with an IQ over 70 would read it first and then either try to
address it or let it alone. This does not mean either you or the
other bimbo, obviously.
Amuse me again with "I didn't read that...here's what I think of
it." Ask your mommy to try to explain the irony. Fuckin'
hilarious. Bimbos are fun.

Pardon me? Did you write something somewhere? Could you direct me to this
alleged post of yours?

[dizzy]

Post by John Griffin

Post by dizzy

Post by spooge
-snip Griffin's whining-
Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular.

Really. Sheesh. Griffendork is obviously hurting, and
desperate to convince us otherwise.

Post by spooge
I didn't read any of it,

Who would bother?

r o t mf f l m mf a o !

Classic over-the-top, desperate nonsense, designed to hide that you
are hurting inside.

Post by John Griffin
Hint: Anyone with an IQ between, say, 50 and 70,

It matters not, to me, what imbeciles like you would do.

[John Griffin]

Post by dizzy

Post by John Griffin

Post by dizzy

Post by spooge
-snip Griffin's whining-
Congratulations on a kook-foam spectacular.

Really. Sheesh. Griffendork is obviously hurting, and
desperate to convince us otherwise.

Post by spooge
I didn't read any of it,

Who would bother?

r o t mf f l m mf a o !

Classic over-the-top, desperate nonsense, designed to hide
that you are hurting inside.

Yes, indeed..."I didn't read that, but it was <whatever>" makes a
normal human's sides hurt. (It's called a "stitch,"
shitforbrains. Get your mommy to look it up for you.)

Snipping what you wish you were capable of addressing adds to
that sort of "pain," chump. <snicker>

Post by dizzy

Post by John Griffin
Hint: Anyone with an IQ between, say, 50 and 70,

It matters not, to me, what imbeciles like you would do.

Whoa! IKYABWAI, poorly done affectation, and comma abuse all in
one idiotic snit! Who would have guessed...

You need to give some serious thought to the obvious facts that
trivial usenet persiflage does very much matter to you and that
you can't ever be even passably good at it.

[Aratzio]

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:54:04 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks, Daedalus

Post by Daedalus
<snip personal info>
Fake Steve Chaney=funny

Who?

Post by Daedalus
Fake Miguel=stupid and whiny.

Who?

Post by Daedalus
RL stalking tard Chaney loses again.

Who?

Post by Daedalus
Jade

Who?