Pick-16 for UK649 Wed. Aug. 1

Damn, I believe you were trying to deny changing
numbers.

Check the archives for yourself.

Who cares?

Let them mean to you whatever
you want to believe, if it suits your perpetual
trolling malady...Let them be useful to others as
they see fit.

Useful? Say what?!

Where's the foam?

I can't believe you guys are actually teaching
GriffinTHAL something. In case you didn't know
GriffinTHAL has a Y=0 learning curve.

It is obvius from his FOAM that the learning curve is
low. Poor Bloviator. I will be his friend if no one
else will.

At this point, you're supposed to follow up your article
with "slllluuuuurrrrrrp." (You showed that that's
precisely according to the faulty algorithm that runs in
lieu of reasoning in whatever you use in lieu of a mind,
you know.)
<snicker>

Don't you have anything better to do than proving, time
and time again, that you are a few chromosomes short of a
complete set of human DNA?

rotmfflmmfao! Another child checks in.
Whoever chumped you into parroting that string of syllables
is laughing at you even more than any of the rest of us
normal humans are, unless he's also lamer than a
three-legged dung beetle, in which case he's just giggling
about your mental privation and manipulability.
Did you intend to make some sort of hilariously inept
attempt to dispute what I said, or is the millionth(*)
cretinous repetition of that sort of thing your limit?
I'll be looking forward to your "thoughts," but I'll be
expecting more parroting of old, weak usenet banality.
(*) Hyperbole, but not by much.

Thank god you've at least stopped yammering about me in
every post.

The word "every" is common enough that even you and the like
should be able to use it correctly, illiterate bimbo.
Furthermore, it's simple enough that if you start now and
work hard, you ought to be able to learn its meaning by this
time next month.
By the way, your so often regurgitated "I never read anything
you post" comments were always funny, since they were just
petulant little snits, but now that you're making idiotic
attempts to characterize that stuff you pored over for hours
in a desperate search for something you dared try to dispute,
they were even funnier.
"God" is a stupid myth, airhead. Get a fuckin' clue.

FOAM!

Indeed.
Is it always so easy to get foamage from this one?

It's easy to try to dispute what I said, imbecile. Work at it.
<snicker> You're going to need lots of help, and I'm really
looking forward to the amusing sight of something as slow as you
trying to actually say something rather than parroting the other
bimbo's constant use of worn out kindergartenish remarks.

Regrettably I must conclude that Jade and Kevin are but second-raters
when it comes to eliciting foamy swish from you, GriffinTHAL. In order
to elicit top rate swishy foam from you, all one must do is tap into
your existential angst about one simple fact: NOT GUILTY.

NOT GUILTY.

The jury said it.
I believe it.
That settles it.

NOT GUILTY.

When the late great Johnny Cochrane told Judge Lance Ito Burrito
"absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY," why didn't Gil Garcetti and Marcia
Clark turn OJ loose RIGHT THEN AND THERE and give him the opportunity
to find the REAL KILLERS!

Instead they wasted millions of dollars and months of time, and the
REAL KILLERS still roam free to play golf all around the nation.

That's just sad. What's even sadder is that you have a traitor's
disregard for the perfection of the jury system. What's wrong with
you? Aren't you an American? WELL?

John Griffin

2007-08-16 19:43:20 UTC

Damn, I believe you were trying to deny changing
numbers.

Check the archives for yourself.

Who cares?

Let them mean to you whatever
you want to believe, if it suits your perpetual
trolling malady...Let them be useful to others as
they see fit.

Useful? Say what?!

Where's the foam?

I can't believe you guys are actually teaching
GriffinTHAL something. In case you didn't know
GriffinTHAL has a Y=0 learning curve.

It is obvius from his FOAM that the learning curve is
low. Poor Bloviator. I will be his friend if no one
else will.

At this point, you're supposed to follow up your
article with "slllluuuuurrrrrrp." (You showed that
that's precisely according to the faulty algorithm that
runs in lieu of reasoning in whatever you use in lieu
of a mind, you know.)
<snicker>

Don't you have anything better to do than proving, time
and time again, that you are a few chromosomes short of
a complete set of human DNA?

rotmfflmmfao! Another child checks in.
Whoever chumped you into parroting that string of
syllables is laughing at you even more than any of the
rest of us normal humans are, unless he's also lamer than
a three-legged dung beetle, in which case he's just
giggling about your mental privation and manipulability.
Did you intend to make some sort of hilariously inept
attempt to dispute what I said, or is the millionth(*)
cretinous repetition of that sort of thing your limit?
I'll be looking forward to your "thoughts," but I'll be
expecting more parroting of old, weak usenet banality.
(*) Hyperbole, but not by much.

Thank god you've at least stopped yammering about me in
every post.

The word "every" is common enough that even you and the
like should be able to use it correctly, illiterate bimbo.
Furthermore, it's simple enough that if you start now and
work hard, you ought to be able to learn its meaning by
this time next month.
By the way, your so often regurgitated "I never read
anything you post" comments were always funny, since they
were just petulant little snits, but now that you're making
idiotic attempts to characterize that stuff you pored over
for hours in a desperate search for something you dared try
to dispute, they were even funnier.
"God" is a stupid myth, airhead. Get a fuckin' clue.

FOAM!

Indeed.
Is it always so easy to get foamage from this one?

It's easy to try to dispute what I said, imbecile. Work at
it. <snicker> You're going to need lots of help, and I'm
really looking forward to the amusing sight of something as
slow as you trying to actually say something rather than
parroting the other bimbo's constant use of worn out
kindergartenish remarks.

BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHA<choke>HAHAHA!

CranstonSHORT says he "must conclude," trying to advance the
hilariously incongruous notion that he has functional logic
circuits in his head. Too fuckin' hilarious.

Post by miguel
NOT GUILTY.
The jury said it.
I believe it.
That settles it.
NOT GUILTY.
When the late great Johnny Cochrane told Judge Lance Ito
Burrito "absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY," why didn't Gil Garcetti
and Marcia Clark turn OJ loose RIGHT THEN AND THERE and give
him the opportunity to find the REAL KILLERS!
Instead they wasted millions of dollars and months of time,
and the REAL KILLERS still roam free to play golf all around
the nation.
That's just sad. What's even sadder is that you have a
traitor's disregard for the perfection of the jury system.
What's wrong with you? Aren't you an American? WELL?

Very, very weak.

miguel

2007-08-16 20:54:13 UTC

Damn, I believe you were trying to deny changing
numbers.

Check the archives for yourself.

Who cares?

Let them mean to you whatever
you want to believe, if it suits your perpetual
trolling malady...Let them be useful to others as
they see fit.

Useful? Say what?!

Where's the foam?

I can't believe you guys are actually teaching
GriffinTHAL something. In case you didn't know
GriffinTHAL has a Y=0 learning curve.

It is obvius from his FOAM that the learning curve is
low. Poor Bloviator. I will be his friend if no one
else will.

At this point, you're supposed to follow up your
article with "slllluuuuurrrrrrp." (You showed that
that's precisely according to the faulty algorithm that
runs in lieu of reasoning in whatever you use in lieu
of a mind, you know.)
<snicker>

Don't you have anything better to do than proving, time
and time again, that you are a few chromosomes short of
a complete set of human DNA?

rotmfflmmfao! Another child checks in.
Whoever chumped you into parroting that string of
syllables is laughing at you even more than any of the
rest of us normal humans are, unless he's also lamer than
a three-legged dung beetle, in which case he's just
giggling about your mental privation and manipulability.
Did you intend to make some sort of hilariously inept
attempt to dispute what I said, or is the millionth(*)
cretinous repetition of that sort of thing your limit?
I'll be looking forward to your "thoughts," but I'll be
expecting more parroting of old, weak usenet banality.
(*) Hyperbole, but not by much.

Thank god you've at least stopped yammering about me in
every post.

The word "every" is common enough that even you and the
like should be able to use it correctly, illiterate bimbo.
Furthermore, it's simple enough that if you start now and
work hard, you ought to be able to learn its meaning by
this time next month.
By the way, your so often regurgitated "I never read
anything you post" comments were always funny, since they
were just petulant little snits, but now that you're making
idiotic attempts to characterize that stuff you pored over
for hours in a desperate search for something you dared try
to dispute, they were even funnier.
"God" is a stupid myth, airhead. Get a fuckin' clue.

FOAM!

Indeed.
Is it always so easy to get foamage from this one?

It's easy to try to dispute what I said, imbecile. Work at
it. <snicker> You're going to need lots of help, and I'm
really looking forward to the amusing sight of something as
slow as you trying to actually say something rather than
parroting the other bimbo's constant use of worn out
kindergartenish remarks.

BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHA<choke>HAHAHA!
CranstonSHORT says he "must conclude," trying to advance the
hilariously incongruous notion that he has functional logic
circuits in his head. Too fuckin' hilarious.

Absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY.
The jury said it.
I believe it.
That settles it.

OJ didn't do the time. Do you know why he didn't do the time?

BECAUSE HE DIDN'T DO THE CRIME.

NOT GUILTY.

Very, very weak.

I'd like to congratulate you on the progress you've shown in accepting
the fact that OJ is NOT GUILTY. You didn't fly off the handle like
you've done 1,000 times before.

Good work Swishy!

John Griffin

2007-08-17 19:43:44 UTC

Congenitally stuporous Mike Cranston, the idiot who writes

Damn, I believe you were trying to deny
changing numbers.

Check the archives for yourself.

Who cares?

Let them mean to you whatever
you want to believe, if it suits your perpetual
trolling malady...Let them be useful to others
as they see fit.

Useful? Say what?!

Where's the foam?

I can't believe you guys are actually teaching
GriffinTHAL something. In case you didn't know
GriffinTHAL has a Y=0 learning curve.

It is obvius from his FOAM that the learning curve
is low. Poor Bloviator. I will be his friend if no
one else will.

At this point, you're supposed to follow up your
article with "slllluuuuurrrrrrp." (You showed that
that's precisely according to the faulty algorithm
that runs in lieu of reasoning in whatever you use in
lieu of a mind, you know.)
<snicker>

Don't you have anything better to do than proving,
time and time again, that you are a few chromosomes
short of a complete set of human DNA?

rotmfflmmfao! Another child checks in.
Whoever chumped you into parroting that string of
syllables is laughing at you even more than any of the
rest of us normal humans are, unless he's also lamer
than a three-legged dung beetle, in which case he's
just giggling about your mental privation and
manipulability.
Did you intend to make some sort of hilariously inept
attempt to dispute what I said, or is the millionth(*)
cretinous repetition of that sort of thing your limit?
I'll be looking forward to your "thoughts," but I'll be
expecting more parroting of old, weak usenet banality.
(*) Hyperbole, but not by much.

Thank god you've at least stopped yammering about me in
every post.

The word "every" is common enough that even you and the
like should be able to use it correctly, illiterate
bimbo. Furthermore, it's simple enough that if you start
now and work hard, you ought to be able to learn its
meaning by this time next month.
By the way, your so often regurgitated "I never read
anything you post" comments were always funny, since they
were just petulant little snits, but now that you're
making idiotic attempts to characterize that stuff you
pored over for hours in a desperate search for something
you dared try to dispute, they were even funnier.
"God" is a stupid myth, airhead. Get a fuckin' clue.

FOAM!

Indeed.
Is it always so easy to get foamage from this one?

It's easy to try to dispute what I said, imbecile. Work at
it. <snicker> You're going to need lots of help, and I'm
really looking forward to the amusing sight of something as
slow as you trying to actually say something rather than
parroting the other bimbo's constant use of worn out
kindergartenish remarks.

BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHA<choke>HAHAHA!
CranstonSHORT says he "must conclude," trying to advance the
hilariously incongruous notion that he has functional logic
circuits in his head. Too fuckin' hilarious.

Absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY.
The jury said it.
I believe it.
That settles it.
OJ didn't do the time. Do you know why he didn't do the time?
BECAUSE HE DIDN'T DO THE CRIME.
NOT GUILTY.

Post by miguel
NOT GUILTY.
The jury said it.
I believe it.
That settles it.
NOT GUILTY.
When the late great Johnny Cochrane told Judge Lance Ito
Burrito "absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY," why didn't Gil
Garcetti and Marcia Clark turn OJ loose RIGHT THEN AND THERE
and give him the opportunity to find the REAL KILLERS!
Instead they wasted millions of dollars and months of time,
and the REAL KILLERS still roam free to play golf all around
the nation.
That's just sad. What's even sadder is that you have a
traitor's disregard for the perfection of the jury system.
What's wrong with you? Aren't you an American? WELL?

Very, very weak.

I'd like to congratulate you on the progress you've shown in
accepting the fact that OJ is NOT GUILTY. You didn't fly off
the handle like you've done 1,000 times before.
Good work Swishy!

Ask me how I knew I could slap that out of you again (and again
and again...), punk.

A note to the normal people: Crybaby midget Cranston believes
that a jury goes and hides in a room and determines by some sort
of sorcery whether or not the defendant did the deed. This is
because he's retarded. I'm not making this up. He has said it,
in essence, hundreds of times. Okay, the number of times isn't
significant...the foppish little dwarf has repeated all of his
pussy remarks hundreds of times since he "borrowed" them from
their authors. Damn, I wish the twerp had balls enough to try to
dispute something. (We all know which pair of "his" parroted
remarks that will slap out of him.)

Dwarf, since I feel so sorry for you, having to live your whole
life as Mike "Dwarf in Mind and Body" Cranston, that I tried to
avoid having to mention one of your stupid beliefs, but as
usualy, you're just too fuckin' thick to know when it's time to
dive under your bed and hide. Let me know if you disagree with
the fact I mentioned about your concept of the jury process.
<snicker>

miguel

2007-08-18 19:07:30 UTC

Damn, I believe you were trying to deny
changing numbers.

Check the archives for yourself.

Who cares?

Let them mean to you whatever
you want to believe, if it suits your perpetual
trolling malady...Let them be useful to others
as they see fit.

Useful? Say what?!

Where's the foam?

I can't believe you guys are actually teaching
GriffinTHAL something. In case you didn't know
GriffinTHAL has a Y=0 learning curve.

It is obvius from his FOAM that the learning curve
is low. Poor Bloviator. I will be his friend if no
one else will.

At this point, you're supposed to follow up your
article with "slllluuuuurrrrrrp." (You showed that
that's precisely according to the faulty algorithm
that runs in lieu of reasoning in whatever you use in
lieu of a mind, you know.)
<snicker>

Don't you have anything better to do than proving,
time and time again, that you are a few chromosomes
short of a complete set of human DNA?

rotmfflmmfao! Another child checks in.
Whoever chumped you into parroting that string of
syllables is laughing at you even more than any of the
rest of us normal humans are, unless he's also lamer
than a three-legged dung beetle, in which case he's
just giggling about your mental privation and
manipulability.
Did you intend to make some sort of hilariously inept
attempt to dispute what I said, or is the millionth(*)
cretinous repetition of that sort of thing your limit?
I'll be looking forward to your "thoughts," but I'll be
expecting more parroting of old, weak usenet banality.
(*) Hyperbole, but not by much.

Thank god you've at least stopped yammering about me in
every post.

The word "every" is common enough that even you and the
like should be able to use it correctly, illiterate
bimbo. Furthermore, it's simple enough that if you start
now and work hard, you ought to be able to learn its
meaning by this time next month.
By the way, your so often regurgitated "I never read
anything you post" comments were always funny, since they
were just petulant little snits, but now that you're
making idiotic attempts to characterize that stuff you
pored over for hours in a desperate search for something
you dared try to dispute, they were even funnier.
"God" is a stupid myth, airhead. Get a fuckin' clue.

FOAM!

Indeed.
Is it always so easy to get foamage from this one?

It's easy to try to dispute what I said, imbecile. Work at
it. <snicker> You're going to need lots of help, and I'm
really looking forward to the amusing sight of something as
slow as you trying to actually say something rather than
parroting the other bimbo's constant use of worn out
kindergartenish remarks.

BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHA<choke>HAHAHA!

Point to me.

Post by John Griffin
CranstonSHORT says he "must conclude," trying to advance the
hilariously incongruous notion that he has functional logic
circuits in his head. Too fuckin' hilarious.

Absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY.
The jury said it.
I believe it.
That settles it.
OJ didn't do the time. Do you know why he didn't do the time?
BECAUSE HE DIDN'T DO THE CRIME.
NOT GUILTY.

NOT GUILTY.