Post by c***@gmail.comPost by David EmerlingI'm just wondering if there is ANYBODY remaining who actually thinks OJ
Simpson was a victim of frame-up during his murder trial?
Everything that has happened in Simpson's life, since that time, only
supports the notion that he is an arrogant, narcissistic hothead who
easily flies off the handle with little or no provocation.
I wonder if the original Simpson jurors (the ones who set him free),
have ever experience a moment of remorse, realizing that they had set a
murderer free into society? Then again, everything I knew of those
jurors (interviews in the aftermath of the trial and books written)
indicate that they probably do not have the intellectual capacity to
come to such a conclusion.
It is somewhat satisfying to see Simpson in jail - where he belongs. I
only wish it had been done much sooner.
David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Dear David,
Yes, I actually do think that O.J. Simpson was the victim of a
conspiracy. Yes, he most definitely was set up and there is one
single item that proves his innocence. Although I do not sympathize
with you, I can certainly understand why you feel the way that you
do.
First of all, I agree that he is very arrogant but we are talking
about two different people here: Orenthal James Simpson and O.J.
Simpson. Like so many of our heroes, he started out as a normal
young man with an extraordinary talent. Now bear in mind that he was
one of many very talented young men on the horizon. But then you
throw in the University of Southern California factor into the mix,
then it becomes something else. Well, inevitably, the press/media
gets hold of it all and .....well, I don't have to tell you how it
ends up. O.J. Simpson stopped being a talented young man and turned
into an institution. Characteristically, arrogance, hotheadedness and
narcissism is all part of the mix - comes with the territory. Very
rarely does fame breed humility.
As far as the jurors are concerned, I would venture to say that they
are no more or less intelligent or capable than the jurors in his
civil case or this latest case. They only did what they were called
upon to do although subsequent to the murder trial, there was no
way that O.J. Simpson would ever get a fair trial, no matter what
ANYONE claims especially when their very words are "We finally got
him".
Although, I address this letter to you, I would like to take this
opportunity to ask this question to you and any others who fmay be
reading this and feel the same as you do. Please tell me exactly
what evidence there was to support the fact that he is guilty of
killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman? Please somebody tell
me. Was it the blood evidence? Don't forget that L.A.P.D. Detective
Van Atter had personal custody of his blood samples and actually
carried them around with him. (Pardon my ignorance, but I always
thought that police labs had custody of such evidence) Man, with that
kind of access, maybe that's how his blood sample wound up at the
murder scene and with such a bloodbath that had taken place, how is
it possible that there was only such a small amount found in the
Bronco? How in the world was O.J., in his haste, able to get into
the Bronco without leaving smears of blood everywhere? And the bloody
glove? Mark Furhman should be utterly embarrased for even thinking a
stunt like that could work. But if you remember, the investigation was
totally bungled that there is absolutely no basis for guilt
I know how ecstatic you, as well as a host of others, are to see
O.J.in jail. But for some reason, I don't think it's enough but I
suppose a bird in the hand is worth two in a bush, heh? Although my
heart goes out to the children of O.J. and Nicole Simpson, the Brown
and Goldman families, I especially have sympathy for Mr. Fred Goldman
because now that O.J. Simpson's freedom has been taken away and, in
essence, the book has been closed and for reasons only Mr. Goldman is
aware of, I wonder where he will place his guilt now?
Sadly, the only crime that Mr. Simpson committed was for being a black
man married to a white woman which makes him the likely suspect in her
death. Unfortunately, for Ron Goldman, he was in the wrong place at
the wrong time.
But I maintain that O.J. Simpson is not guilty and there is one simple
fact that supports it all and if everyone had just calmed down and
used their brains, many lives would have not been destroyed. a lot of
money could have been saved, a lot of hatred and contempt could have
been spared and a lot of people would not be looking stupid and that
O.J. SIMPSON COULD NOT HAVE COMMITTED THE MURDERS OF NICOLE BROWN
SIMPSON AND RONALD GOLDMAN BECAUSE HE WAS NOT THERE. IF YOU LOOK AT
THE BLOODY SHOE PRINTS, YOU WILL SEE THAT THE SHOES PRINTS WERE GOING
STRAIGHT. O.J. SIMPSON DOES NOT WALK STRAIGHT !!!!! OR DID EVERYBODY
MISS THAT??????- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well Sweetheart...for what it is worth..
member of this newsgroup. Here is the link if you are interested.
dedicated to the evidence of the OJ Case. The posters were quite
case.
Here is but one point of view.... google the website by Dick Wagner
some replies, many illustrated.