Guilty, guilty, guilty!!!

[Puma]

It's about damn time!

LAS VEGAS -- Thirteen years to the day after being acquitted of killing his
wife and her friend in Los Angeles, O.J. Simpson was found guilty of
robbing two sports-memorabilia dealers at gunpoint in a Las Vegas hotel
room.

It took 13 years but the scumbag has finally gotten some payback.

C'mon, where's that old crowd? Crazy Bob, Patricia, Puppetmaster? Where the
heck is everybody?!

[yadler]

Post by Puma
It's about damn time!
LAS VEGAS -- Thirteen years to the day after being acquitted of
killing his wife and her friend in Los Angeles, O.J. Simpson was found
guilty of robbing two sports-memorabilia dealers at gunpoint in a Las
Vegas hotel room.
It took 13 years but the scumbag has finally gotten some payback.
C'mon, where's that old crowd? Crazy Bob, Patricia, Puppetmaster?
Where the heck is everybody?!

I was “yadler.” Still around and thrilled to pieces.

[r***@my-deja.com]

Post by Puma
It's about damn time!
LAS VEGAS -- Thirteen years to the day after being acquitted of killing his
wife and her friend in Los Angeles, O.J. Simpson was found guilty of
robbing two sports-memorabilia dealers at gunpoint in a Las Vegas hotel
room.
It took 13 years but the scumbag has finally gotten some payback.
C'mon, where's that old crowd? Crazy Bob, Patricia, Puppetmaster? Where the
heck is everybody?!

How can anyone be a "fan" of this shell of a man named Simpson? Maybe
one could have been a fan of his years ago. That is, until 1994. He
was guilty 13 years ago; and he's guilty now. The only difference is
that now he's truly guilty of more than one felony. Yeah, where are
all these OJ boosters including "Crazy Bob" (crazy alright);
"Patricia" (ha, a woman is a simpson booster - go figure); or
"Puppetmaster" (a puppet whose strings were pulled by Simpson's slick
defense lawyers). Well, perhaps they're in as much denial as Mr.
Simpson himself.

[miguel]

Post by Puma
It's about damn time!
LAS VEGAS -- Thirteen years to the day after being acquitted of killing his
wife and her friend in Los Angeles, O.J. Simpson was found guilty of
robbing two sports-memorabilia dealers at gunpoint in a Las Vegas hotel
room.
It took 13 years but the scumbag has finally gotten some payback.
C'mon, where's that old crowd? Crazy Bob, Patricia, Puppetmaster? Where the
heck is everybody?!

How can anyone be a "fan" of this shell of a man named Simpson?  Maybe
one could have been a fan of his years ago.  That is, until 1994.  He
was guilty 13 years ago; and he's guilty now.  The only difference is
that now he's truly guilty of more than one felony.  Yeah, where are
all these OJ boosters including "Crazy Bob" (crazy alright);
"Patricia" (ha, a woman is a simpson booster - go figure); or
"Puppetmaster" (a puppet whose strings were pulled by Simpson's slick
defense lawyers).  Well, perhaps they're in as much denial as Mr.
Simpson himself.

Why do you hate America? Don't you know that 13 years ago OJ Simpson
was absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY?

The jury said it.
I believe it.
That settles it.

NOT GUILTY 13 years ago.

Fast forward to 2008, and you see a sham of a travesty of a
miscarriage of justice in Las Vegas.

Why? Because the judge did not dismiss jurors who believed OJ was
guilty 13 years ago.

HOW STUPID ARE THOSE JURORS!

NOT GUILTY means NOT GUILTY.

So OJ was convicted this time because the judge allowed stupid jurors
on the jury.

[r***@my-deja.com]

Post by miguel
Why do you hate America?

I don't. Rather, I and many other Americans would like to see the
American judicial system work properly.

Post by miguel
Don't you know that 13 years ago OJ Simpson
was absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY?
The jury said it.
I believe it.
That settles it.

That only "settles it" for the minority who refuse to look at the true
facts of the case.

Post by miguel
NOT GUILTY 13 years ago.
Fast forward to 2008, and you see a sham of a travesty of a
miscarriage of justice in Las Vegas.

One sham deserves another. Had the original trial and verdict not
been such a sham, then maybe Simpson wouldn't be in this mess. Deal
with it.

Post by miguel
Why? Because the judge did not dismiss jurors who believed OJ was
guilty 13 years ago.
HOW STUPID ARE THOSE JURORS!

The jurors 13 years ago were stupid, ignorant, had an agenda, or all
of the above.

Post by miguel
NOT GUILTY means NOT GUILTY.

And in 2008 GUILTY means GUILTY.

Post by miguel
So OJ was convicted this time because the judge allowed stupid jurors
on the jury.

And he was not convicted in 1995 because the judge allowed stupid
jurors on the jury.

As the saying goes: Case closed!

[rand mair fheal]

Post by r***@my-deja.com
That only "settles it" for the minority who refuse to look at the true
facts of the case.

the true facts of teh case are irrelevant
he is not guilty of those murders
he can never be tried for those murders again

you can rant if you want
but it has no effect

Post by r***@my-deja.com

Post by miguel
NOT GUILTY means NOT GUILTY.

And in 2008 GUILTY means GUILTY.

pending appeal

not guilty verdicts cannot be appealed
guilty verdicts can be appealed

if the trial is deemed unfair he will get a new trial
if a fair trial is impossible he will be freed

Post by r***@my-deja.com
And he was not convicted in 1995 because the judge allowed stupid
jurors on the jury.

a fair trial means the jury is only considering the case at hand
and not trying to reverse another verdict in another case

arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call
its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang

[The Demon of Mockery & Silliness, Chas. E. Pemberton]

Hail Eris! On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:10:47 -0700, ***@my-deja.com sang, "If
I were a Deep One...blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub,

Post by miguel
NOT GUILTY 13 years ago.
Fast forward to 2008, and you see a sham of a travesty of a miscarriage
of justice in Las Vegas.

One sham deserves another. Had the original trial and verdict not been
such a sham, then maybe Simpson wouldn't be in this mess. Deal with it.

Post by miguel
Why? Because the judge did not dismiss jurors who believed OJ was guilty
13 years ago.
HOW STUPID ARE THOSE JURORS!

The jurors 13 years ago were stupid, ignorant, had an agenda, or all of
the above.

No, actually, the cops were racist idiots, who thought it'd be perfectly
OK to try to turn a very strong case for murder into an "open-and-shut"
case, and the prosecution chose to go along with it, rather than
bitchslap them seven ways from Sunday, as they should have done. The
jurors returned the only verdict they could have, given the evidence
tampering by the cops. Doesn't mean that he's *not* guilty, it means
he's /legally/ "not guilty", and can never be tried for the crime again.
Basically, the LAPD set him up to get away with murder. After the whole
Rodney King fiasco, it was richly ironic. Time does indeed wound all
heels.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pretzel_Cabal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
relations because she is right up there in Alaska right next door to
Russia." -- Steve Doocy of FOX News was obviously a football player in
his early adulthood.

Hey, Aggie! Does this sound familiar?
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>

"Marcella proves once again that she's an ignorant racist bigot." -- OK,
what race are Greeks, again? Aggie's so much more knowledgeable than I
about that sort of thing. Message-ID:
<O-***@eclipse.net.uk>

"It could be several." -- Aggie answers marc_CH's question about which
drugs Jamaican athletes such as Powell and Bolt have been taking.
Message-ID: <***@eclipse.net.uk>

"Only athletes on drugs win meddles. [...]

"And the funny thing is the Greek weightlifters were not winning meddles
even while on drugs. Clearly every single weightlifter that beat a Greek
weightlifter was taking more drugs than they were." -- Yeah, that's the
ticket, Aggie! Message-ID:
<***@eclipse.net.uk>

"Do Usenet posters on drugs not know how to spell 'medals'?" -- They
really don't, marc_CH. Message-ID:
<***@mid.individual.net>

"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:
<***@4ax.com>

"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:
<***@eclipse.net.uk>

"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)

[rand mair fheal]

In article <***@meow.disorg.flonk.discord.kookology>,
"The Demon of Mockery & Silliness, Chas. E. Pemberton"

Post by The Demon of Mockery & Silliness, Chas. E. Pemberton
I were a Deep One...blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub,

Post by miguel
NOT GUILTY 13 years ago.
Fast forward to 2008, and you see a sham of a travesty of a miscarriage
of justice in Las Vegas.

One sham deserves another. Had the original trial and verdict not been
such a sham, then maybe Simpson wouldn't be in this mess. Deal with it.

Post by miguel
Why? Because the judge did not dismiss jurors who believed OJ was guilty
13 years ago.
HOW STUPID ARE THOSE JURORS!

The jurors 13 years ago were stupid, ignorant, had an agenda, or all of
the above.

No, actually, the cops were racist idiots, who thought it'd be perfectly
OK to try to turn a very strong case for murder into an "open-and-shut"
case, and the prosecution chose to go along with it, rather than
bitchslap them seven ways from Sunday, as they should have done. The

the second part is the bs (before shrub) there were strict time limits
on how a case had to progress through the courts
unless the defendant waived the right to a speedy trial

so they couldve delayed arresting simpson until their case was ready
but they didnt and simpson demanded a speedy trial
and the prosecution was stumbling around doing catch up the entire trial

arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call
its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang

[r***@my-deja.com]

On Oct 8, 3:55 am, "The Demon of Mockery & Silliness, Chas. E.

Post by The Demon of Mockery & Silliness, Chas. E. Pemberton
I were a Deep One...blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub,

Post by miguel
NOT GUILTY 13 years ago.
Fast forward to 2008, and you see a sham of a travesty of a miscarriage
of justice in Las Vegas.

One sham deserves another.  Had the original trial and verdict not been
such a sham, then maybe Simpson wouldn't be in this mess.  Deal with it.

Post by miguel
Why? Because the judge did not dismiss jurors who believed OJ was guilty
13 years ago.
HOW STUPID ARE THOSE JURORS!

The jurors 13 years ago were stupid, ignorant, had an agenda, or all of
the above.

No, actually, the cops were racist idiots, who thought it'd be perfectly
OK to try to turn a very strong case for murder into an "open-and-shut"
case, and the prosecution chose to go along with it, rather than
bitchslap them seven ways from Sunday, as they should have done. The
jurors returned the only verdict they could have, given the evidence
tampering by the cops. Doesn't mean that he's *not* guilty, it means
he's /legally/ "not guilty", and can never be tried for the crime again.
Basically, the LAPD set him up to get away with murder. After the whole
Rodney King fiasco, it was richly ironic. Time does indeed wound all
heels.

Like Darden says, someday there will be someone who judges racist cops
and murderers separately.

[miguel]

Post by r***@my-deja.com
On Oct 8, 3:55 am, "The Demon of Mockery & Silliness, Chas. E.

Post by The Demon of Mockery & Silliness, Chas. E. Pemberton
I were a Deep One...blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub,

Post by miguel
NOT GUILTY 13 years ago.
Fast forward to 2008, and you see a sham of a travesty of a miscarriage
of justice in Las Vegas.

One sham deserves another.  Had the original trial and verdict not been
such a sham, then maybe Simpson wouldn't be in this mess.  Deal with it.

When OJ said ABSOLUTELY, 100% NOT GUILTY, Marcia Clark and Chris
Darden should have let him go so he could go find the REAL KILLERS who
were probably hiding on a golf course.

Post by r***@my-deja.com

Post by The Demon of Mockery & Silliness, Chas. E. Pemberton

Post by miguel
Why? Because the judge did not dismiss jurors who believed OJ was guilty
13 years ago.
HOW STUPID ARE THOSE JURORS!

The jurors 13 years ago were stupid, ignorant, had an agenda, or all of
the above.

No man.

Post by r***@my-deja.com

Post by The Demon of Mockery & Silliness, Chas. E. Pemberton
No, actually, the cops were racist idiots, who thought it'd be perfectly
OK to try to turn a very strong case for murder into an "open-and-shut"
case, and the prosecution chose to go along with it, rather than
bitchslap them seven ways from Sunday, as they should have done. The
jurors returned the only verdict they could have, given the evidence
tampering by the cops. Doesn't mean that he's *not* guilty, it means
he's /legally/ "not guilty", and can never be tried for the crime again.
Basically, the LAPD set him up to get away with murder. After the whole
Rodney King fiasco, it was richly ironic. Time does indeed wound all
heels.

Like Darden says, someday there will be someone who judges racist cops
and murderers separately.

Someday, there will be a prosecutor who realizes that when a Heismann
Trophy winner says ABSOLUTELY, 10)% NOT GUILTY, it means ABSOLUTELY,
100% NOT GUILTY.