Discussion:
Resnick's Deposition: The
(too old to reply)
f***@gmail.com
2018-03-09 06:14:52 UTC
Permalink
OK Patrick-
You and OJ have called Faye lots of nasty names like "slut, liar,
druggie, sex-addict, wannabe, annoying..."
And OJ accompanies his name-calling with his ad nauseum declarations that
he is 100% sure Faye and "her world" are responsible for the drug murders
of Nicole and Ron.
Yet OJ responds to news that she's fled the country by scoffing, saying
she SHOULD be frightened, b/c the drug cartels are probably trying to
kill her due to her continuing to mis-direct blame away from them and
toward an innocent OJ (?)... oh, and by the way, OJ sure hopes she makes
peace with his lord Jesus Christ.
Why are you letting Faye get away with this? Why aren't you on a
rampage, demanding Faye be arrested and interrogated about
who/where/why killed the mother of your children and set you up to take
the rap? If Garcetti won't do it, why don't you & your private
investigators?! You and your lawyers made a half-assed effort to look
into this, during the trial, but then it was only to deflect blame from
you.
Aren't you still FURIOUS with this woman, who is responsible for Nicole's
murder? Isn't this the one who is causing you to go through and pay for a
second (civil) trial? Why was your cross-exam. of Faye during the
depo. so tame? Why did it focus on nit-picking details, rather than
going after the truth re: this woman knows who the real killer is???
When you recently heard Kato accuse you, and Darden and the Garveys and the
Browns, why didn't you scream for the thousandth time, "YOU GUYS! FAYE
DID IT!! YOU ALL KNEW FAYE, YOU KNEW FAYE'S RELATIONSHIP WITH NICOLE--
WHY DON'T YOU SEE THIS?"
Why do you respond re: Kato's tendency to get confused
& Darden's problems with anger, and just make general denials of your
guilt?
Why wouldn't you be screaming at the top of your lungs--"Kato! I didn't
do it-- it was Faye Resnick and her world!" Better yet, why not argue
this more, esp during your public statements? Tell us why, tell us more
re: your evid. about this. Why don't you ever xpress outrage that she is
being allowed to flee the country, possibly forever, and escape
liability and escape your
investigations into the truth re: the real killers?
Holley, you snidely point out that the prosec. didn't call Faye as a
witness, (although you yourself admit that the prosec. would have been
severely limited as to what they could ask Faye due to the h.say rule
excluding anything Nicole said to her about OJ's abuse and threats.)
Well- guess what-- THE DEFENSE CHOSE NOT TO CALL FAYE as well.
Yes- the defense had the chance to question the person OJ is POSITIVELY
SURE is responsible for the murders that OJ's accused of. Instead, the
defense calls a parade of barely relevant witnesses to comment on things
like how OJ was getting along with his girlfriend at the time of the
murders, and how much dandruff OJ has and how much Ron Shipp had to drink
and how OJ acted at a golf game the week before.
All this stuff is more important than questioning the woman who has
direct info. re: the real killers???
True, OJ's lawyers did ask Ito if they could ask indirect questions about
this subj. area from Faye's ex-boyfriend who was a close OJ buddy. But
when they were told no, why didn't they get Faye up there immediately?
One of the most striking things about the case was, and still is, the
absolute lack of evid. or info. about who else but OJ could be guilty.
And it is just absurd for OJ to vaguely allude, every once in a while,
that by the way, he knows for sure who did it and who could enlighten us
(and him) with all the details, but lets just let it drop now while he
plays some more golf and continues to foot the bills for the civil lawyers.
you got it girl!! if you look at youtube look at OJ UNCUT and watch Johnny Cochran cross examine Fornesic latent prints specialist Gilbert Auigular testmony how 17 of those prints at the bundy crime scene did not match OJ SIMPSON he did say one belong to faye resnick and others belong to nicole also detective ron phillips print was there too so who are the rest of the prints belong to?
p***@aol.com
2018-03-20 13:17:04 UTC
Permalink
Anyone that's interested in hearing about the "real" relationship between
Simpson and Nicole should read Resnick's deposition. Contrast her
testimony with Simpson's, wherein he says no abuse, amicable separation,
no drugs, no extramarital affairs... For those of you without the time
or inclination to plod through the lengthy depo., you might enjoy some of
the highlights below.
Please note that despite what Simpson says, Faye and Nicole were best
friends, and thus, Faye "was" in a position to know about the Simpson
relationship. Faye saw Nicole 4 to 5 times a week minumum, spoke on the
phone 3 times a day, their children were good friends, and they
considered each other best friends.
Faye describes Simpson when he was angry: ...teeth clenched, narrow,
black eyes, protruding jaw, sweating, face distorted, could hardly talk,
animalistic...
Simpson beat Nicole while she was pregnant, and complained about her
getting fat.
He had a girlfriend for three years while married to Nicole and supported
the girlfriend (Tawny Kittan (?)) financially. Bought her $20,000
earrings. He would beat Nicole when she confronted him regarding his
relationships. The '89 beating occurred because she confronted him about
his two other women. During that beating, Nicole told Faye that Simpson
beat, punched, kicked and slapped her.
Nicole said that Simpson had sexual relations with Tropic girls (models)
during their marriage. Numerous one night stands. When the new crew
came in, he'd date the new crew. Nicole had caught Simpson in the
Rockingham guest house during their marriage with one of his girls.
Nicole told Faye that she had called "911" 30 times.
After the divorce and prior to '93, Nicole had a relationship with Marcus
Allen. This was an extremely sore point with Simpson--"...how could she
do that?"
Faye saw Simpson snort cocaine at Harley Davidson Cafe (Mark Packer was
present as well). Back and the NY condo that evening, Simpson and Nicole
fought about the Enquirer article which talked about the abuse and
Nicole's 911 call. It was Nicole's fault, Simpson said. Faye, in the
bedroom, was afraid to sleep because she feared Simpson would harm Nicole.
Also saw Simpson snort cocaine at Rockingham (AC present). Simpson told
Faye he could get her however many drugs she needed. "OJ admitted to
using drugs, it was no secret."
Simpson's initial reaction to Nicole's initiation of the reconciliation
in '93 was that he was happy with Paula, but later the same day, he
called Nicole 5 times and went to see her.
Nicole's demands regarding the reconciliation: No beatings, no drugs, no
interferring with her friendships, no controlling her.
Simpson insisted she tell him about all her relationships with men during
the separation and divorce. He learned about Marcus Allen.
During a conversation with Faye, Simpson told her ('93) that if he ever
saw Nicole with Marcus, he didn't know what he would do.
Nicole made the decision to break of the reconciliation with Simpson
during the Cabo trip (April '94). Simpson had openly flirted with a
waitress where the group, including the children, were having dinner.
Also made the comment about Nicole's fear of frogs and his being the
Frogman. Nicole was afraid to tell Simpson she was breaking off the
relationship and didn't do so until after Simpson returned from Puerto
Rico, but in the meantime refused to return his calls.
Simpson was angry at Faye because she hid that Nicole was ending the
relationship. Simpson had been calling Faye at all hours, day and night.
After Nicole broke off with him, he told Faye that if he caught Nicole
with another man before Augst, he would kill her. He also told this to
Nicole.
Nicole was seeing Marcus Allen in May of 94. Faye was told this by
Cynthia Shahian and Cora Fishman, and also saw Marcus' car parked at
Bundy. Nicole told Faye that she loved Marcus Allen, during a
conversation that occurred during the last two weeks of her life.
Regarding the IRS, Simpson told Faye he wanted to cause Nicole as much
pain as possible. Wanted to make her live in reality so that she would
see how lucky she had it, being with him.
Early in May 94, Simpson, stopping at Starbucks were Nicole, Faye, Ron
Goldman and his friends were having coffee, says "this is my wife you
know. I want to talk to you Nicole."
When Faye was staying at Bundy prior to entering rehab in early June of
94, Nicole was unable to find her house key and remote, which she wanted
to give to Faye. After searching through the drawer where it was
normally kept, Nicole said, "Oh my God! OJ must have taken my keys last
week when he was here!"
It's well established that members of three groups congenitally prejudiced against Simpson had him as the murderer before they finished the autopsy. Spousal abuse was the instant proof required by the white racists and the sisterhood.

While I realize the Simpson haters have still to bother with actually assessing the credibility of the testimony and authenticity of any evidence against him, it bears keeping in mind that the charges of spousal abuse surfaced in connection with their divorce. Indeed, in his deposition Simpson notes that Nicole had been urged by her attorney to raise the issue of spousal abuse to improve her leverage for a better settlement.

Never before in the history of divorce actions has any such thing ever been hear of.

There is, however, an even more compelling reason for Nicole to raise in her divorce action. She had signed a prenup that specifically limited the settlement she could get - UNLESS she could somehow break it. The answer: Spousal abuse. That's the sure and certain motive for her and her friends to raise that issue and to substantiate it happened.

The stalking issues she raised after the divorce were based on exactly the same grounds. Her settlement was limited to a rental property in San Francisco and no alimony, plus child support. She loved a high life style and went through the proceeds of the condo in no time. She needed money.

How to get it from Simpson. An attorney colleague at the NYC Department where I worked gave the best answer. Simpson's stalking that created safety issues were grounds she was creating to re-open the divorce by claiming she needed more money for the expenses she would incur to protect herself from the threat he posed to her. That's your full and complete motive for her making those claims.

The fact is, Simpson was done with her. He was that night calling Gretchen Stockdale, a Playboy Playmate, undoubtedly to arrange a meet. Their failed reconciliation made crystal clear to Simpson that he and Nicole had no future.

He was not interested in her. Spousal abuse was a phony motive. Since Simpson had absolutely no motive to commit the murders, that's more than enough grounds to dismiss the charges against him especially with all the fabricated evidence and false testimony that was produced against him that the prosecution covered up and protected by perjury proofing every one of their witnesses for their false statements.

Prien
Kittens Magazine
2021-12-18 06:40:14 UTC
Permalink
just one question.....can anyone take resnick at her word? now, i
am no OJ lover, (he killed those poor people and got away with it) but i
really can't consider resnick a reliable sorce either.....and not only
because of her drug abuse.....mostly because of her first book when she
profited from her "friends" death by desribing her love life with marcus
allen and others......what kind of "friend" is that?
You would have to be a detective at the crime scene or a witness to a murder or a racist, to say that OJ killed those people. He was acquitted.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...