f***@gmail.com
2018-03-09 06:14:52 UTC
OK Patrick-
You and OJ have called Faye lots of nasty names like "slut, liar,
druggie, sex-addict, wannabe, annoying..."
And OJ accompanies his name-calling with his ad nauseum declarations that
he is 100% sure Faye and "her world" are responsible for the drug murders
of Nicole and Ron.
Yet OJ responds to news that she's fled the country by scoffing, saying
she SHOULD be frightened, b/c the drug cartels are probably trying to
kill her due to her continuing to mis-direct blame away from them and
toward an innocent OJ (?)... oh, and by the way, OJ sure hopes she makes
peace with his lord Jesus Christ.
Why are you letting Faye get away with this? Why aren't you on a
rampage, demanding Faye be arrested and interrogated about
who/where/why killed the mother of your children and set you up to take
the rap? If Garcetti won't do it, why don't you & your private
investigators?! You and your lawyers made a half-assed effort to look
into this, during the trial, but then it was only to deflect blame from
you.
Aren't you still FURIOUS with this woman, who is responsible for Nicole's
murder? Isn't this the one who is causing you to go through and pay for a
second (civil) trial? Why was your cross-exam. of Faye during the
depo. so tame? Why did it focus on nit-picking details, rather than
going after the truth re: this woman knows who the real killer is???
When you recently heard Kato accuse you, and Darden and the Garveys and the
Browns, why didn't you scream for the thousandth time, "YOU GUYS! FAYE
DID IT!! YOU ALL KNEW FAYE, YOU KNEW FAYE'S RELATIONSHIP WITH NICOLE--
WHY DON'T YOU SEE THIS?"
Why do you respond re: Kato's tendency to get confused
& Darden's problems with anger, and just make general denials of your
guilt?
Why wouldn't you be screaming at the top of your lungs--"Kato! I didn't
do it-- it was Faye Resnick and her world!" Better yet, why not argue
this more, esp during your public statements? Tell us why, tell us more
re: your evid. about this. Why don't you ever xpress outrage that she is
being allowed to flee the country, possibly forever, and escape
liability and escape your
investigations into the truth re: the real killers?
Holley, you snidely point out that the prosec. didn't call Faye as a
witness, (although you yourself admit that the prosec. would have been
severely limited as to what they could ask Faye due to the h.say rule
excluding anything Nicole said to her about OJ's abuse and threats.)
Well- guess what-- THE DEFENSE CHOSE NOT TO CALL FAYE as well.
Yes- the defense had the chance to question the person OJ is POSITIVELY
SURE is responsible for the murders that OJ's accused of. Instead, the
defense calls a parade of barely relevant witnesses to comment on things
like how OJ was getting along with his girlfriend at the time of the
murders, and how much dandruff OJ has and how much Ron Shipp had to drink
and how OJ acted at a golf game the week before.
All this stuff is more important than questioning the woman who has
direct info. re: the real killers???
True, OJ's lawyers did ask Ito if they could ask indirect questions about
this subj. area from Faye's ex-boyfriend who was a close OJ buddy. But
when they were told no, why didn't they get Faye up there immediately?
One of the most striking things about the case was, and still is, the
absolute lack of evid. or info. about who else but OJ could be guilty.
And it is just absurd for OJ to vaguely allude, every once in a while,
that by the way, he knows for sure who did it and who could enlighten us
(and him) with all the details, but lets just let it drop now while he
plays some more golf and continues to foot the bills for the civil lawyers.
you got it girl!! if you look at youtube look at OJ UNCUT and watch Johnny Cochran cross examine Fornesic latent prints specialist Gilbert Auigular testmony how 17 of those prints at the bundy crime scene did not match OJ SIMPSON he did say one belong to faye resnick and others belong to nicole also detective ron phillips print was there too so who are the rest of the prints belong to?You and OJ have called Faye lots of nasty names like "slut, liar,
druggie, sex-addict, wannabe, annoying..."
And OJ accompanies his name-calling with his ad nauseum declarations that
he is 100% sure Faye and "her world" are responsible for the drug murders
of Nicole and Ron.
Yet OJ responds to news that she's fled the country by scoffing, saying
she SHOULD be frightened, b/c the drug cartels are probably trying to
kill her due to her continuing to mis-direct blame away from them and
toward an innocent OJ (?)... oh, and by the way, OJ sure hopes she makes
peace with his lord Jesus Christ.
Why are you letting Faye get away with this? Why aren't you on a
rampage, demanding Faye be arrested and interrogated about
who/where/why killed the mother of your children and set you up to take
the rap? If Garcetti won't do it, why don't you & your private
investigators?! You and your lawyers made a half-assed effort to look
into this, during the trial, but then it was only to deflect blame from
you.
Aren't you still FURIOUS with this woman, who is responsible for Nicole's
murder? Isn't this the one who is causing you to go through and pay for a
second (civil) trial? Why was your cross-exam. of Faye during the
depo. so tame? Why did it focus on nit-picking details, rather than
going after the truth re: this woman knows who the real killer is???
When you recently heard Kato accuse you, and Darden and the Garveys and the
Browns, why didn't you scream for the thousandth time, "YOU GUYS! FAYE
DID IT!! YOU ALL KNEW FAYE, YOU KNEW FAYE'S RELATIONSHIP WITH NICOLE--
WHY DON'T YOU SEE THIS?"
Why do you respond re: Kato's tendency to get confused
& Darden's problems with anger, and just make general denials of your
guilt?
Why wouldn't you be screaming at the top of your lungs--"Kato! I didn't
do it-- it was Faye Resnick and her world!" Better yet, why not argue
this more, esp during your public statements? Tell us why, tell us more
re: your evid. about this. Why don't you ever xpress outrage that she is
being allowed to flee the country, possibly forever, and escape
liability and escape your
investigations into the truth re: the real killers?
Holley, you snidely point out that the prosec. didn't call Faye as a
witness, (although you yourself admit that the prosec. would have been
severely limited as to what they could ask Faye due to the h.say rule
excluding anything Nicole said to her about OJ's abuse and threats.)
Well- guess what-- THE DEFENSE CHOSE NOT TO CALL FAYE as well.
Yes- the defense had the chance to question the person OJ is POSITIVELY
SURE is responsible for the murders that OJ's accused of. Instead, the
defense calls a parade of barely relevant witnesses to comment on things
like how OJ was getting along with his girlfriend at the time of the
murders, and how much dandruff OJ has and how much Ron Shipp had to drink
and how OJ acted at a golf game the week before.
All this stuff is more important than questioning the woman who has
direct info. re: the real killers???
True, OJ's lawyers did ask Ito if they could ask indirect questions about
this subj. area from Faye's ex-boyfriend who was a close OJ buddy. But
when they were told no, why didn't they get Faye up there immediately?
One of the most striking things about the case was, and still is, the
absolute lack of evid. or info. about who else but OJ could be guilty.
And it is just absurd for OJ to vaguely allude, every once in a while,
that by the way, he knows for sure who did it and who could enlighten us
(and him) with all the details, but lets just let it drop now while he
plays some more golf and continues to foot the bills for the civil lawyers.